EMSM.DE vs. XMME.DE
EMSM.DE (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMSM.DE tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while XMME.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMSM.DE returned 8.20%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XMME.DE. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EMSM.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
EMSM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMSM.DE achieves a 27.59% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.
EMSM.DE
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 27.59%
- 6M
- 28.30%
- 1Y
- 48.92%
- 3Y*
- 20.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 29.85%
- 1Y
- 50.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
EMSM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMSM.DE SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF | 27.59% | 18.76% | 13.62% | 5.12% | -14.15% | 4.29% | 6.29% | 21.03% | -11.23% | 7.19% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 30.06% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.57% | 21.91% | -11.16% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMSM.DE and XMME.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.99 |
The correlation between EMSM.DE and XMME.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMSM.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMSM.DE
XMME.DE
EMSM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMSM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.55 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.83 | 4.98 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.39 | 18.04 | -0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMSM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 3.00 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.51 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.45 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
EMSM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMSM.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.49%, which is greater than XMME.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSM.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMSM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.49% | -31.96% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -10.67% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.25% | -19.16% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.87% | -24.38% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -1.04% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.06% | -9.53% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.95% | -0.09% |
Volatility
EMSM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) have volatilities of 7.40% and 7.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMSM.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | 7.48% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.93% | 14.90% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 17.70% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 16.74% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 18.61% | -0.28% |
EMSM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMSM.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMSM.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMSM.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, EMSM.DE and XMME.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMSM.DE.
EMSM.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EMSM.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMSM.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer