EMSM.DE vs. FWIA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.DE) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE).
EMSM.DE and FWIA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMSM.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Apr 26, 2010. FWIA.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE All-World. It was launched on Jun 26, 2023. Both EMSM.DE and FWIA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EMSM.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMSM.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMSM.DE SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF | 2.87% | 18.76% | 13.62% | 2.99% |
FWIA.DE Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc | -0.49% | 9.02% | 24.70% | 7.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMSM.DE achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than FWIA.DE's -0.49% return.
EMSM.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 21.38%
- 3Y*
- 12.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
FWIA.DE
- 1D
- 2.18%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 13.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMSM.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMSM.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FWIA.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMSM.DE vs. FWIA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMSM.DE
FWIA.DE
EMSM.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.DE) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMSM.DE | FWIA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 0.84 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 1.21 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.58 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | 7.10 | -0.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMSM.DE | FWIA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 0.84 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 1.10 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMSM.DE and FWIA.DE is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EMSM.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMSM.DE nor FWIA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EMSM.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMSM.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.49%, which is greater than FWIA.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSM.DE and FWIA.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMSM.DE | FWIA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.49% | -20.96% | -15.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -13.06% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.29% | -4.01% | -6.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.16% | -2.55% | -7.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 1.93% | +1.53% |
Volatility
EMSM.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE) at 4.55%. This indicates that EMSM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWIA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMSM.DE | FWIA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 4.55% | +3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.65% | 8.55% | +4.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.13% | 16.07% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 13.26% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 13.26% | +4.90% |