PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMSM.DE vs. FVEM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMSM.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.DE) and Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMSM.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMSM.DE achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than FVEM.DE's 5.87% return.


EMSM.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
-8.28%
YTD
2.87%
6M
6.65%
1Y
21.38%
3Y*
12.70%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
7.42%

FVEM.DE

1D
3.08%
1M
-4.48%
YTD
5.87%
6M
9.07%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMSM.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMSM.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FVEM.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMSM.DE vs. FVEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMSM.DE
EMSM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EMSM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMSM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMSM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EMSM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMSM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FVEM.DE
FVEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FVEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMSM.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.DE) and Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMSM.DEFVEM.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

1.34

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

1.85

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.35

-0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.18

8.40

-2.22

EMSM.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMSM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the FVEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMSM.DE and FVEM.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMSM.DEFVEM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.34

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.78

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between EMSM.DE and FVEM.DE is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EMSM.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMSM.DE nor FVEM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EMSM.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMSM.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.49%, which is greater than FVEM.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSM.DE and FVEM.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMSM.DEFVEM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.49%

-18.76%

-17.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.64%

-12.45%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.29%

-6.90%

-3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.16%

-3.57%

-6.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

2.96%

+0.50%

Volatility

EMSM.DE vs. FVEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.DE) and Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE) have volatilities of 7.96% and 7.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMSM.DEFVEM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

7.63%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.65%

13.05%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.13%

18.10%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

15.39%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

15.39%

+2.77%