EMSF vs. FMQQ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

EMSF (Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF) and FMQQ (FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. EMSF is actively managed, while FMQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, EMSF returned 45.07% vs -16.17% for FMQQ. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMSF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FMQQ.

Performance

EMSF vs. FMQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) and FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMSF achieves a 36.62% return, which is significantly higher than FMQQ's -11.66% return.

EMSF

• 1D: -4.70%
• 1M: -5.78%
• 6M: 26.94%
• YTD: 36.62%
• 1Y: 45.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FMQQ

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 8.36%
• 6M: -11.51%
• YTD: -11.66%
• 1Y: -16.17%
• 3Y*: 3.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMSF vs. FMQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EMSF Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF	36.62%	19.20%	-3.09%	0.98%
FMQQ FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF	-11.66%	10.77%	12.45%	8.93%

Correlation

The correlation between EMSF and FMQQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023	0.64

The correlation between EMSF and FMQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EMSF vs. FMQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMSF

EMSF Risk / Return Rank: 62
EMSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
EMSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
EMSF Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EMSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EMSF Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FMQQ

FMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4
FMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMSF vs. FMQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) and FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMSF	FMQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	-0.84	+2.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	-1.13	+3.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.87	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	-0.53	+3.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.46	-0.94	+10.40

EMSF vs. FMQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the FMQQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMSF and FMQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMSF vs. FMQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMSF drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum FMQQ drawdown of -64.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSF and FMQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMSF	FMQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.75%	-64.51%	+39.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.57%	-30.82%	+16.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.82%	-52.24%	+40.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.74%	-49.45%	+43.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.78%	17.17%	-12.39%

Volatility

EMSF vs. FMQQ - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) has a higher volatility of 13.86% compared to FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) at 4.92%. This indicates that EMSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMSF	FMQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.86%	4.92%	+8.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.56%	16.29%	+9.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.18%	19.25%	+9.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.15%	24.72%	-0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.15%	24.72%	-0.57%

EMSF vs. FMQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMSF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FMQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMSF vs. FMQQ - Dividend Comparison

EMSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than FMQQ's 0.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EMSF Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF	1.38%	1.88%	3.29%	0.02%
FMQQ FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF	0.69%	0.61%	0.45%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMSF and FMQQ in my portfolio?

EMSF and FMQQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMSF or FMQQ?

EMSF has higher volatility (13.86%) compared to FMQQ (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMSF dropped -24.75% vs FMQQ's -64.51%.

Which ETF is better, EMSF or FMQQ?

On 1-year performance, EMSF leads with 45.07% vs -16.17% for FMQQ. On fees, EMSF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, FMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMSF or FMQQ?

Over the 1-year period, EMSF has performed better with a 45.07% return vs -16.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMSF or FMQQ?

EMSF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FMQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMSF or FMQQ?

EMSF has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.69% for FMQQ.

What is the main difference between EMSF and FMQQ?

They also come from different issuers: Matthews and EMQQ. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for EMSF and 0.86% for FMQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.