PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMRSX vs. COBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMRSX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund (EMRSX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMRSX achieves a 24.38% return, which is significantly higher than COBYX's 10.17% return.


EMRSX

1D
0.42%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
24.38%
6M
25.46%
1Y
45.35%
3Y*
23.07%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*

COBYX

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
10.17%
6M
9.61%
1Y
16.44%
3Y*
7.69%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
4.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMRSX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMRSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund
24.38%35.27%6.43%8.91%-21.42%-3.38%18.56%21.40%-1.64%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
10.17%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-10.97%9.40%-2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EMRSX and COBYX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2018

0.51

The correlation between EMRSX and COBYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMRSX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMRSX
EMRSX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EMRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EMRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMRSX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund (EMRSX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMRSXCOBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

1.76

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.87

5.66

+7.21

EMRSX vs. COBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMRSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the COBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMRSX and COBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMRSX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMRSX drawdown since its inception was -41.28%, which is greater than COBYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMRSX and COBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMRSXCOBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.28%

-34.18%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.30%

-8.95%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-16.29%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.59%

-17.10%

-21.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-1.62%

-3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.19%

-6.77%

-8.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

2.80%

+0.75%

Volatility

EMRSX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund (EMRSX) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 3.10%. This indicates that EMRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMRSXCOBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.29%

3.10%

+9.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.16%

9.57%

+9.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.15%

11.91%

+9.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

13.99%

+3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

13.65%

+5.92%

EMRSX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMRSX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMRSX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison

EMRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than COBYX's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.07%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%
EMRSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund
2.96%3.68%2.42%3.08%2.48%5.59%1.50%0.94%0.53%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMRSX and COBYX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMRSX has higher volatility (12.29%) compared to COBYX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMRSX dropped -41.28% vs COBYX's -34.18%.

EMRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMRSX and COBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer