PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMRSX vs. BADEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMRSX vs. BADEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund (EMRSX) and BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMRSX achieves a 29.10% return, which is significantly higher than BADEX's 18.63% return.


EMRSX

1D
2.46%
1M
9.85%
YTD
29.10%
6M
32.28%
1Y
58.68%
3Y*
24.82%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*

BADEX

1D
0.87%
1M
7.65%
YTD
18.63%
6M
20.27%
1Y
27.66%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMRSX vs. BADEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMRSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund
29.10%35.27%6.43%8.91%-21.42%-3.38%3.20%
BADEX
BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund
18.63%13.95%10.15%11.67%-11.34%4.49%2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EMRSX and BADEX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2020

0.89

The correlation between EMRSX and BADEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMRSX vs. BADEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMRSX
EMRSX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EMRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EMRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

BADEX
BADEX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BADEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BADEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BADEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BADEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BADEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMRSX vs. BADEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund (EMRSX) and BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMRSXBADEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.34

2.72

+0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.15

3.83

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.56

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

3.02

+1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.46

11.94

+5.53

EMRSX vs. BADEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMRSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is comparable to the BADEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMRSX and BADEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMRSXBADEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34

2.72

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.70

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.85

-0.27

Drawdowns

EMRSX vs. BADEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMRSX drawdown since its inception was -41.28%, which is greater than BADEX's maximum drawdown of -21.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMRSX and BADEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMRSXBADEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.28%

-21.86%

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.30%

-8.89%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-10.29%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.64%

-21.86%

-16.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.30%

-5.63%

-9.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

2.25%

+1.08%

Volatility

EMRSX vs. BADEX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund (EMRSX) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX) at 4.15%. This indicates that EMRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BADEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMRSXBADEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

4.15%

+3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.54%

8.93%

+6.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.12%

10.35%

+7.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

10.22%

+7.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

10.37%

+8.86%

EMRSX vs. BADEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMRSX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BADEX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMRSX vs. BADEX - Dividend Comparison

EMRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than BADEX's 6.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BADEX
BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund
6.34%7.52%2.27%1.92%2.43%7.54%0.03%0.00%0.00%
EMRSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund
2.85%3.68%2.42%3.08%2.48%5.59%1.50%0.94%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMRSX and BADEX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMRSX has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to BADEX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMRSX dropped -41.28% vs BADEX's -21.86%.

EMRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMRSX and BADEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer