EMRSX vs. BADEX
EMRSX (JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund) and BADEX (BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, EMRSX returned 7.20%/yr vs 7.13%/yr for BADEX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMRSX charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for BADEX.
Performance
EMRSX vs. BADEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMRSX achieves a 29.10% return, which is significantly higher than BADEX's 18.63% return.
EMRSX
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- 9.85%
- YTD
- 29.10%
- 6M
- 32.28%
- 1Y
- 58.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
BADEX
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 7.65%
- YTD
- 18.63%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 27.66%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- —
EMRSX vs. BADEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMRSX JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund | 29.10% | 35.27% | 6.43% | 8.91% | -21.42% | -3.38% | 3.20% |
BADEX BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund | 18.63% | 13.95% | 10.15% | 11.67% | -11.34% | 4.49% | 2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMRSX and BADEX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between EMRSX and BADEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMRSX vs. BADEX — Risk / Return Rank
EMRSX
BADEX
EMRSX vs. BADEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund (EMRSX) and BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMRSX | BADEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.34 | 2.72 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.15 | 3.83 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.56 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 3.02 | +1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.46 | 11.94 | +5.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMRSX | BADEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34 | 2.72 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.70 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.85 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
EMRSX vs. BADEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMRSX drawdown since its inception was -41.28%, which is greater than BADEX's maximum drawdown of -21.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMRSX and BADEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMRSX | BADEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.28% | -21.86% | -19.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.30% | -8.89% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | -10.29% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.64% | -21.86% | -16.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.30% | -5.63% | -9.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 2.25% | +1.08% |
Volatility
EMRSX vs. BADEX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund (EMRSX) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX) at 4.15%. This indicates that EMRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BADEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMRSX | BADEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 4.15% | +3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | 8.93% | +6.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.12% | 10.35% | +7.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 10.22% | +7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 10.37% | +8.86% |
EMRSX vs. BADEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMRSX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BADEX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMRSX vs. BADEX - Dividend Comparison
EMRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than BADEX's 6.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BADEX BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund | 6.34% | 7.52% | 2.27% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 7.54% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMRSX JPMorgan Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Equity Fund | 2.85% | 3.68% | 2.42% | 3.08% | 2.48% | 5.59% | 1.50% | 0.94% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMRSX and BADEX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMRSX has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to BADEX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMRSX dropped -41.28% vs BADEX's -21.86%.
EMRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMRSX and BADEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer