PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMR vs. UVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EMR vs. UVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Universal Corporation (UVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMR achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly higher than UVV's 3.14% return. Over the past 10 years, EMR has outperformed UVV with an annualized return of 12.97%, while UVV has yielded a comparatively lower 5.09% annualized return.


EMR

1D
0.69%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
5.61%
6M
3.12%
1Y
14.43%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
12.97%

UVV

1D
-1.88%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
3.14%
6M
4.14%
1Y
-7.53%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
5.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMR vs. UVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
5.61%8.92%29.73%3.75%5.74%18.19%8.61%31.53%-11.87%29.05%
UVV
Universal Corporation
3.14%2.27%-13.39%35.79%1.82%19.59%-8.96%11.08%7.79%-14.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EMR and UVV is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 1988

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between EMR and UVV has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

EMR:

$4.33

UVV:

$1.73

PE Ratio

EMR:

32.10

UVV:

30.51

PS Ratio

EMR:

4.28

UVV:

0.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

EMR:

$18.32B

UVV:

$2.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EMR:

$7.22B

UVV:

$412.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

EMR:

$3.87B

UVV:

$212.91M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMR vs. UVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMR
EMR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

UVV
UVV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
UVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVV Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
UVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMR vs. UVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Universal Corporation (UVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMRUVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.96

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

-0.50

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.35

-0.83

+2.19

EMR vs. UVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the UVV Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMR and UVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMRUVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

-0.32

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.19

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.18

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.28

+0.06

Drawdowns

EMR vs. UVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMR drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, smaller than the maximum UVV drawdown of -69.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMR and UVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMRUVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-69.75%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.45%

-15.23%

-8.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.62%

-29.70%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-29.70%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.77%

-45.68%

-5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.31%

-14.30%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.11%

-18.59%

+4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.68%

9.04%

+1.64%

Volatility

EMR vs. UVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) is 7.27%, while Universal Corporation (UVV) has a volatility of 10.11%. This indicates that EMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMRUVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

10.11%

-2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.63%

18.46%

+6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.04%

23.77%

+6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.25%

24.57%

+2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.10%

28.94%

+0.16%

Dividends

EMR vs. UVV - Dividend Comparison

EMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than UVV's 6.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
1.58%1.61%1.70%2.14%2.15%2.18%2.49%2.58%3.26%2.76%3.42%3.94%
UVV
Universal Corporation
6.22%6.18%5.87%4.72%5.95%5.64%6.30%5.29%4.80%4.11%3.33%3.71%

Financials

EMR vs. UVV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Emerson Electric Co. and Universal Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
4.56B
0
(EMR) Total Revenue
(UVV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EMR and UVV have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UVV has higher volatility (10.11%) compared to EMR (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMR dropped -59.05% vs UVV's -69.75%.

EMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMR and UVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer