EMR vs. DIV
EMR (Emerson Electric Co.) is a stock, while DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) is Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Over the past 10 years, EMR returned 13.96%/yr vs 4.24%/yr for DIV. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
EMR vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMR having a 17.60% return and DIV slightly higher at 17.72%. Over the past 10 years, EMR has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 13.96%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.24% annualized return.
EMR
- 1D
- 3.36%
- 1M
- 11.36%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 17.60%
- 1Y
- 10.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.31%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.30%
DIV
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 9.56%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 1Y
- 21.12%
- 3Y*
- 12.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 4.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.54M | $3.98M | $4.46M | |
| $449.33M | $375.59M | $404.34M |
EMR vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 17.60% | 8.92% | 29.73% | 3.75% | 5.74% | 18.19% | 8.61% | 31.53% | -11.87% | 29.05% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 17.72% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMR and DIV is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EMR and DIV has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMR vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
EMR
DIV
EMR vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMR | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.35 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 4.13 | -3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.09 | 12.04 | -10.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMR vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMR drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than DIV's maximum drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMR and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMR | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.05% | -52.74% | -6.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.45% | -5.13% | -18.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.62% | -12.33% | -17.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | -21.14% | -8.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.77% | -52.74% | +1.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.47% | -1.99% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.10% | -6.95% | -7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.06% | 1.76% | +8.30% |
Volatility
EMR vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.14%. This indicates that EMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMR | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 3.14% | +6.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.92% | 7.71% | +18.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.84% | 10.51% | +21.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.56% | 13.70% | +13.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.20% | 18.00% | +11.20% |
Dividends
EMR vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
EMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than DIV's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.53% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 1.42% | 1.61% | 1.70% | 2.14% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.49% | 2.58% | 3.26% | 2.76% | 3.42% | 3.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMR and DIV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMR has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to DIV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMR dropped -59.05% vs DIV's -52.74%.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMR and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer