EMQQ vs. USO
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMQQ returned 4.86%/yr vs 3.80%/yr for USO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.86% expense ratio.
Performance
EMQQ vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -17.59% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 98.48% return. Over the past 10 years, EMQQ has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 4.86%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.80% annualized return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -17.59%
- 6M
- -19.58%
- 1Y
- -13.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- -10.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
USO
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- 98.48%
- 6M
- 95.54%
- 1Y
- 97.37%
- 3Y*
- 28.86%
- 5Y*
- 23.92%
- 10Y*
- 3.80%
EMQQ vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -17.59% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 80.45% | 33.86% | -29.82% | 68.20% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 98.48% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 28.97% | 64.68% | -67.79% | 32.61% | -19.57% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and USO is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.16 |
The correlation between EMQQ and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
USO
EMQQ vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMQQ | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | 2.22 | -2.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | 2.81 | -3.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.37 | -0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 5.12 | -5.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 9.66 | -10.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMQQ | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 | 2.22 | -2.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.67 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.10 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | -0.18 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -98.19% | +24.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.96% | -20.39% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.96% | -26.05% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.31% | -36.23% | -30.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | -86.75% | +13.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.59% | -85.39% | +28.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.35% | -75.30% | +43.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.93% | 10.81% | +4.12% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is 6.58%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that EMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 15.03% | -8.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 38.18% | -22.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.46% | 44.26% | -23.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.12% | 36.04% | -2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 39.00% | -8.40% |
EMQQ vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EMQQ and USO have an expense ratio of 0.86%.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 3.75% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and USO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to EMQQ (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 10-year performance, EMQQ leads with 4.86% vs 3.80% for USO. Both ETFs have the same 0.86% expense ratio. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EMQQ has performed better with a 4.86% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMQQ and USO have the same expense ratio: 0.86% per year.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and USCF.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer