PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMQQ vs. TJUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMQQ vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -17.59% return, which is significantly lower than TJUN's 5.26% return.


EMQQ

1D
1.06%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
-17.59%
6M
-19.58%
1Y
-13.29%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
-10.61%
10Y*
4.86%

TJUN

1D
0.04%
1M
0.70%
YTD
5.26%
6M
6.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMQQ vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EMQQ and TJUN is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMQQ vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMQQ
EMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
EMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

TJUN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMQQ vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMQQTJUNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.83

EMQQ vs. TJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMQQTJUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

2.49

-2.39

Drawdowns

EMQQ vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and TJUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMQQTJUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.24%

-4.47%

-68.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.59%

0.00%

-56.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.35%

-0.60%

-30.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.93%

Volatility

EMQQ vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMQQTJUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.46%

7.55%

+12.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.12%

7.55%

+25.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.60%

7.55%

+23.05%

EMQQ vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMQQ vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison

EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
3.75%3.09%1.70%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.18%1.29%0.00%0.94%0.75%0.08%
TJUN
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMQQ and TJUN have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMQQ is cheaper at 0.86% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMQQ is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.

EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.95% for TJUN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMQQ and TJUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer