EMQQ vs. TJUN
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EMQQ returned -10.75% vs 8.48% for TJUN. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.
Performance
EMQQ vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -13.58% return, which is significantly lower than TJUN's -0.94% return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 9.20%
- 6M
- -12.37%
- YTD
- -13.58%
- 1Y
- -10.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- -6.86%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.19%
TJUN
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- 6M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 1Y
- 8.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.08M | $1.14M | $1.73M | |
| $26.04K | $85.71K | $115.87K |
EMQQ vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -13.58% | 4.35% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | -0.94% | 11.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and TJUN is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025 | 0.64 |
The correlation between EMQQ and TJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
TJUN
EMQQ vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMQQ | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.18 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 0.87 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 3.79 | -4.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -9.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and TJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -9.77% | -63.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.70% | -9.77% | -23.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.48% | -6.33% | -48.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -1.10% | -30.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.02% | 2.24% | +16.78% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is 5.25%, while FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) has a volatility of 6.63%. This indicates that EMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 6.63% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.86% | 9.42% | +7.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.22% | 10.70% | +10.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.73% | 10.40% | +22.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 10.40% | +20.20% |
EMQQ vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 3.57% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and TJUN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TJUN has higher volatility (6.63%) compared to EMQQ (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs TJUN's -9.77%.
On 1-year performance, TJUN leads with 8.48% vs -10.75% for EMQQ. On fees, EMQQ is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TJUN has performed better with a 8.48% return vs -10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMQQ is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.
EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while TJUN tracks iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.95% for TJUN.
TJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and TJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer