EMQQ vs. TJUN
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.
Performance
EMQQ vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -17.59% return, which is significantly lower than TJUN's 5.26% return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -17.59%
- 6M
- -19.58%
- 1Y
- -13.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- -10.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
TJUN
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -17.59% | 3.13% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 5.26% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and TJUN is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
TJUN
EMQQ vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMQQ | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMQQ | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 2.49 | -2.39 |
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and TJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -4.47% | -68.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.59% | 0.00% | -56.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.35% | -0.60% | -30.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.93% | — | — |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.46% | 7.55% | +12.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.12% | 7.55% | +25.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 7.55% | +23.05% |
EMQQ vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 3.75% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and TJUN have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMQQ is cheaper at 0.86% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMQQ is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.
EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.95% for TJUN.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and TJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer