EMQQ vs. TDSC
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and TDSC (Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while TDSC is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. EMQQ is passively managed, while TDSC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMQQ returned -6.86%/yr vs 2.43%/yr for TDSC. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TDSC.
Performance
EMQQ vs. TDSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -13.58% return, which is significantly lower than TDSC's 10.18% return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 9.20%
- 6M
- -12.37%
- YTD
- -13.58%
- 1Y
- -10.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- -6.86%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.19%
TDSC
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 17.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.08M | $1.14M | $1.73M | |
| $121.84K | $447.26K | $287.79K |
EMQQ vs. TDSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -13.58% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 21.12% |
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 10.18% | 6.56% | 7.10% | 7.63% | -19.67% | 14.81% | -0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and TDSC is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. TDSC — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
TDSC
EMQQ vs. TDSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMQQ | TDSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.33 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 3.25 | -3.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 11.57 | -12.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. TDSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than TDSC's maximum drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and TDSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | TDSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -21.51% | -51.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.70% | -5.35% | -28.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.70% | -14.24% | -19.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.70% | -21.51% | -40.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.48% | -1.40% | -53.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -9.16% | -22.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.02% | 1.50% | +17.52% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. TDSC - Volatility Comparison
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) at 2.18%. This indicates that EMQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | TDSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 2.18% | +3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.86% | 7.18% | +9.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.22% | 9.33% | +11.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.73% | 10.37% | +22.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 10.23% | +20.37% |
EMQQ vs. TDSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than TDSC's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. TDSC - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than TDSC's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 3.57% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 1.61% | 2.92% | 2.06% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and TDSC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMQQ has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to TDSC (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs TDSC's -21.51%.
On 5-year performance, TDSC leads with 2.43% vs -6.86% for EMQQ. On fees, TDSC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TDSC has been the lower-risk option at 2.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TDSC has performed better with a 2.43% return vs -6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDSC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 1.61% for TDSC.
EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TDSC is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.69% for TDSC.
TDSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and TDSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer