EMQQ vs. TDSC
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and TDSC (Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while TDSC is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. EMQQ is passively managed, while TDSC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMQQ returned -12.41%/yr vs 2.67%/yr for TDSC. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TDSC.
Performance
EMQQ vs. TDSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -24.03% return, which is significantly lower than TDSC's 8.99% return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -24.03%
- 6M
- -23.90%
- 1Y
- -21.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- -12.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
TDSC
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 16.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ vs. TDSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -24.03% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 21.12% |
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 8.99% | 6.56% | 7.10% | 7.63% | -19.67% | 14.81% | -0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and TDSC is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.42 |
The correlation between EMQQ and TDSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (5 years) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. TDSC — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
TDSC
EMQQ vs. TDSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMQQ | TDSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.32 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 3.13 | -3.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 11.61 | -12.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. TDSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than TDSC's maximum drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and TDSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | TDSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -21.51% | -51.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.55% | -5.35% | -27.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.55% | -14.24% | -18.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.31% | -21.51% | -44.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.98% | -2.47% | -57.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.47% | -9.31% | -22.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.56% | 1.44% | +15.12% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. TDSC - Volatility Comparison
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) at 3.67%. This indicates that EMQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | TDSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 3.67% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 7.31% | +9.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.77% | 9.42% | +11.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.14% | 10.38% | +22.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.61% | 10.27% | +20.34% |
EMQQ vs. TDSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than TDSC's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. TDSC - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than TDSC's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 4.07% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 2.05% | 2.92% | 2.06% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and TDSC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMQQ has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to TDSC (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs TDSC's -21.51%.
On 5-year performance, TDSC leads with 2.67% vs -12.41% for EMQQ. On fees, TDSC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TDSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TDSC has performed better with a 2.67% return vs -12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDSC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 2.05% for TDSC.
EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TDSC is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.69% for TDSC.
TDSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and TDSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer