EMQQ vs. SMST
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while SMST is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. EMQQ is passively managed, while SMST is actively managed. Over the past year, EMQQ returned -16.16% vs 240.03% for SMST. At a correlation of -0.39, they often move in opposite directions. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SMST.
Performance
EMQQ vs. SMST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -18.19% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -27.96% return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- 6M
- -19.76%
- YTD
- -18.19%
- 1Y
- -16.16%
- 3Y*
- 3.52%
- 5Y*
- -10.12%
- 10Y*
- 4.45%
SMST
- 1D
- 5.26%
- 1M
- 44.38%
- 6M
- -15.07%
- YTD
- -27.96%
- 1Y
- 240.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -18.19% | 20.66% | 1.91% |
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | -27.96% | -44.36% | -91.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and SMST is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024 | -0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
SMST
EMQQ vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMQQ | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.30 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 2.83 | -3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 5.47 | -6.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and SMST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -99.25% | +26.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.70% | -85.39% | +51.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.90% | -97.17% | +40.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.60% | -90.89% | +59.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.98% | 44.09% | -26.11% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is 5.39%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 56.59%. This indicates that EMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 56.59% | -51.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.94% | 135.88% | -118.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.93% | 149.23% | -128.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.06% | 167.74% | -134.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.57% | 167.74% | -137.17% |
EMQQ vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 3.78% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and SMST have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMST has higher volatility (56.59%) compared to EMQQ (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs SMST's -99.25%.
On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 240.03% vs -16.16% for EMQQ. On fees, EMQQ is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 240.03% return vs -16.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMQQ is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.
EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 1.29% for SMST.
SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and SMST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer