EMQQ vs. ONLN
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and ONLN (ProShares Online Retail ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while ONLN is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the ProShares Online Retail Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMQQ returned -10.61%/yr vs -5.67%/yr for ONLN. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for ONLN.
Performance
EMQQ vs. ONLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -17.59% return, which is significantly lower than ONLN's -4.42% return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -17.59%
- 6M
- -19.58%
- 1Y
- -13.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- -10.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
ONLN
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -5.53%
- 1Y
- 16.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.76%
- 5Y*
- -5.67%
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ vs. ONLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -17.59% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 80.45% | 33.86% | -28.01% |
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | -4.42% | 33.03% | 24.85% | 27.37% | -50.07% | -25.22% | 111.82% | 19.93% | -24.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and ONLN is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2018 | 0.75 |
The correlation between EMQQ and ONLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMQQ vs. ONLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMQQ
ONLN
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMQQ
ONLN
Technology
EMQQ
ONLN
Communication Services
EMQQ
ONLN
-
Financial Services
EMQQ
ONLN
-
Real Estate
EMQQ
ONLN
-
Utilities
EMQQ
ONLN
-
Industrials
EMQQ
ONLN
-
Consumer Defensive
EMQQ
ONLN
Healthcare
EMQQ
ONLN
-
Basic Materials
EMQQ
-
ONLN
-
Energy
EMQQ
-
ONLN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. ONLN — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
ONLN
EMQQ vs. ONLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMQQ | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | 0.70 | -1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | 1.09 | -1.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.13 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 0.90 | -1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 2.31 | -3.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMQQ | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 | 0.70 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | -0.17 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.15 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. ONLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, roughly equal to the maximum ONLN drawdown of -71.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and ONLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -71.77% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.96% | -19.75% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.96% | -27.97% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.31% | -69.19% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.59% | -38.11% | -18.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.35% | -35.43% | +4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.93% | 7.68% | +7.25% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. ONLN - Volatility Comparison
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) at 5.94%. This indicates that EMQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 5.94% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 17.19% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.46% | 23.68% | -3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.12% | 33.06% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 32.10% | -1.50% |
EMQQ vs. ONLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than ONLN's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. ONLN - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than ONLN's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 3.75% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and ONLN have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMQQ has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to ONLN (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs ONLN's -71.77%.
On 5-year performance, ONLN leads with -5.67% vs -10.61% for EMQQ. On fees, ONLN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, ONLN has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ONLN has performed better with a -5.67% return vs -10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONLN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.34% for ONLN.
EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ONLN is Consumer Discretionary Equities. EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while ONLN tracks ProShares Online Retail Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.58% for ONLN.
ONLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and ONLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer