EMQQ vs. IBIC
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EMQQ returned -21.65% vs 4.42% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
EMQQ vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -24.03% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.43% return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -24.03%
- 6M
- -23.90%
- 1Y
- -21.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- -12.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -24.03% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 1.31% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.43% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and IBIC is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.02 |
The correlation between EMQQ and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
IBIC
EMQQ vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMQQ | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -10.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 2.22 | -1.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 16.56 | -17.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 58.67 | -59.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -0.90% | -72.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.55% | -0.27% | -32.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.98% | -0.08% | -59.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.47% | -0.10% | -31.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.56% | 0.08% | +16.48% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that EMQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 0.17% | +5.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 0.67% | +16.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.77% | 0.89% | +19.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.14% | 1.56% | +31.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.61% | 1.56% | +29.05% |
EMQQ vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than IBIC's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 4.07% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.58% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and IBIC have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMQQ has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.42% vs -21.65% for EMQQ. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.42% return vs -21.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 3.58% for IBIC.
EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer