EMQQ vs. EMOP
Compare and contrast key facts about Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF (EMQQ) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP).
EMQQ and EMOP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMQQ is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2014. EMOP is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jun 17, 2025.
Performance
EMQQ vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMQQ vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF | -18.41% | 4.27% |
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 9.93% | 16.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -18.41% return, which is significantly lower than EMOP's 9.93% return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -7.00%
- YTD
- -18.41%
- 6M
- -26.81%
- 1Y
- -11.51%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- -12.03%
- 10Y*
- 4.82%
EMOP
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 14.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMQQ vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. EMOP — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
EMOP
EMQQ vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF (EMQQ) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMQQ | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMQQ | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 2.06 | -1.97 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and EMOP is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than EMOP's 0.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF | 3.79% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 0.61% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than EMOP's maximum drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and EMOP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -12.88% | -60.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.02% | -7.79% | -49.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.99% | -1.92% | -29.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.72% | — | — |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. EMOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.48% | 18.23% | +4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.23% | 18.23% | +15.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.54% | 18.23% | +12.31% |