EMQQ vs. EMCS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and EMCS (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMQQ tracks the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index while EMCS tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMQQ returned -12.41%/yr vs 7.51%/yr for EMCS. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMCS.

Performance

EMQQ vs. EMCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -24.03% return, which is significantly lower than EMCS's 30.08% return.

EMQQ

• 1D: -2.14%
• 1M: -5.28%
• YTD: -24.03%
• 6M: -23.90%
• 1Y: -21.65%
• 3Y*: 3.56%
• 5Y*: -12.41%
• 10Y*: 4.32%

EMCS

• 1D: -6.03%
• 1M: 5.49%
• YTD: 30.08%
• 6M: 31.16%
• 1Y: 55.24%
• 3Y*: 26.52%
• 5Y*: 7.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMQQ vs. EMCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF	-24.03%	20.66%	13.79%	4.48%	-30.70%	-32.53%	80.45%	33.86%	-8.75%
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF	30.08%	38.71%	10.12%	5.68%	-23.58%	-2.02%	19.72%	19.54%	-1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQQ and EMCS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018	0.85

The correlation between EMQQ and EMCS shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMQQ vs. EMCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMQQ	EMCS
Consumer Cyclical	33.1%	9.1%
Technology	8.2%	50.7%
Communication Services	6.8%	7.4%
Financial Services	3.6%	26.0%
Real Estate	2.7%	1.8%
Utilities	0.4%	0.0%
Industrials	0.3%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	0.0%
Healthcare	0.0%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	2.6%
Energy	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

EMQQ vs. EMCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMQQ

EMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
EMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

EMCS

EMCS Risk / Return Rank: 75
EMCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
EMCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EMCS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EMCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
EMCS Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMQQ vs. EMCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMQQ	EMCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.05	2.19	-3.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.47	2.77	-4.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.41	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.67	3.88	-4.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.31	14.31	-15.62

EMQQ vs. EMCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is lower than the EMCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQQ and EMCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMQQ vs. EMCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than EMCS's maximum drawdown of -44.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and EMCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMQQ	EMCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.24%	-44.86%	-28.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.55%	-14.32%	-18.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.55%	-16.73%	-15.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.31%	-42.06%	-24.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.98%	-6.03%	-53.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.47%	-16.52%	-14.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.56%	3.87%	+12.69%

Volatility

EMQQ vs. EMCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is 5.99%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) has a volatility of 14.09%. This indicates that EMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMQQ	EMCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.99%	14.09%	-8.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.76%	23.01%	-6.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.77%	25.41%	-4.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.14%	21.33%	+11.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.61%	22.04%	+8.57%

EMQQ vs. EMCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMQQ vs. EMCS - Dividend Comparison

EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than EMCS's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF	1.46%	1.66%	0.67%	3.07%	2.26%	1.46%	1.40%	3.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF	4.07%	3.09%	1.70%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.18%	1.29%	0.00%	0.94%	0.75%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMQQ and EMCS in my portfolio?

EMQQ and EMCS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMQQ or EMCS?

EMCS has higher volatility (14.09%) compared to EMQQ (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs EMCS's -44.86%.

Which ETF is better, EMQQ or EMCS?

On 5-year performance, EMCS leads with 7.51% vs -12.41% for EMQQ. On fees, EMCS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMQQ or EMCS?

Over the 5-year period, EMCS has performed better with a 7.51% return vs -12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMQQ or EMCS?

EMCS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMQQ or EMCS?

EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 1.46% for EMCS.

What is the main difference between EMQQ and EMCS?

EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while EMCS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.15% for EMCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.