EMCS vs. SCHE
EMCS (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF) and SCHE (Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMCS tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index while SCHE tracks the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMCS returned 9.04%/yr vs 5.77%/yr for SCHE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EMCS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SCHE.
Performance
EMCS vs. SCHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCS achieves a 38.43% return, which is significantly higher than SCHE's 13.71% return.
EMCS
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 12.26%
- YTD
- 38.43%
- 6M
- 40.42%
- 1Y
- 66.57%
- 3Y*
- 29.17%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHE
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 13.71%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 31.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
EMCS vs. SCHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF | 38.43% | 38.71% | 10.12% | 5.68% | -23.58% | -2.02% | 19.72% | 19.54% | -1.41% |
SCHE Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 13.71% | 26.54% | 10.60% | 8.93% | -17.84% | -0.65% | 14.49% | 20.31% | -3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCS and SCHE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between EMCS and SCHE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMCS vs. SCHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMCS
SCHE
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Technology
EMCS
SCHE
Financial Services
EMCS
SCHE
Consumer Cyclical
EMCS
SCHE
Communication Services
EMCS
SCHE
Basic Materials
EMCS
SCHE
Real Estate
EMCS
SCHE
Industrials
EMCS
SCHE
Energy
EMCS
SCHE
Consumer Defensive
EMCS
SCHE
Healthcare
EMCS
SCHE
Utilities
EMCS
SCHE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMCS vs. SCHE — Risk / Return Rank
EMCS
SCHE
EMCS vs. SCHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMCS | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.35 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.67 | 2.84 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.33 | 10.03 | +7.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMCS vs. SCHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCS drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, which is greater than SCHE's maximum drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCS and SCHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCS | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.86% | -36.20% | -8.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.32% | -11.29% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.73% | -17.08% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.06% | -33.31% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.52% | -12.57% | -3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 3.19% | +0.66% |
Volatility
EMCS vs. SCHE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) at 6.77%. This indicates that EMCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMCS | SCHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.36% | 6.77% | +5.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.11% | 14.69% | +7.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.67% | 17.09% | +7.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 17.84% | +3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 19.50% | +2.43% |
EMCS vs. SCHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHE's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMCS vs. SCHE - Dividend Comparison
EMCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than SCHE's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF | 1.37% | 1.66% | 0.67% | 3.07% | 2.26% | 1.46% | 1.40% | 3.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHE Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.53% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 3.83% | 2.88% | 2.86% | 2.09% | 3.27% | 2.64% | 2.31% | 2.27% | 2.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, EMCS and SCHE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EMCS has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to SCHE (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCS dropped -44.86% vs SCHE's -36.20%.
On 5-year performance, EMCS leads with 9.04% vs 5.77% for SCHE. On fees, SCHE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SCHE has been the lower-risk option at 6.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMCS has performed better with a 9.04% return vs 5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EMCS.
SCHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.37% for EMCS.
EMCS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index, while SCHE tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMCS and 0.11% for SCHE.
EMCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMCS and SCHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer