PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMQQ vs. EMCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMQQ vs. EMCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -17.59% return, which is significantly lower than EMCR's 24.88% return.


EMQQ

1D
1.06%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
-17.59%
6M
-19.58%
1Y
-13.29%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
-10.61%
10Y*
4.86%

EMCR

1D
1.07%
1M
9.77%
YTD
24.88%
6M
27.30%
1Y
52.64%
3Y*
24.20%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMQQ vs. EMCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
-17.59%20.66%13.79%4.48%-30.70%-32.53%80.45%33.86%-7.35%
EMCR
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF
24.88%33.25%9.69%10.55%-18.73%5.54%13.49%22.41%-1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQQ and EMCR is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2018

0.81

The correlation between EMQQ and EMCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMQQ vs. EMCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMQQ
EMCR

Consumer Cyclical

33.1%
10.6%

Technology

8.2%
36.2%

Communication Services

6.8%
9.9%

Financial Services

3.6%
20.7%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.8%

Utilities

0.4%
1.5%

Industrials

0.3%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
2.8%

Healthcare

0.0%
5.6%

Basic Materials

-

3.9%

Energy

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EMQQ
33.1%
EMCR
10.6%

Technology

EMQQ
8.2%
EMCR
36.2%

Communication Services

EMQQ
6.8%
EMCR
9.9%

Financial Services

EMQQ
3.6%
EMCR
20.7%

Real Estate

EMQQ
2.7%
EMCR
1.8%

Utilities

EMQQ
0.4%
EMCR
1.5%

Industrials

EMQQ
0.3%
EMCR
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

EMQQ
0.2%
EMCR
2.8%

Healthcare

EMQQ
0.0%
EMCR
5.6%

Basic Materials

EMQQ

-

EMCR
3.9%

Energy

EMQQ

-

EMCR
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMQQ vs. EMCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMQQ
EMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
EMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

EMCR
EMCR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EMCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCR Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCR Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMQQ vs. EMCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMQQEMCRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.65

2.71

-3.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.84

3.48

-4.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.50

-0.59

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

3.87

-4.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.83

14.84

-15.66

EMQQ vs. EMCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the EMCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQQ and EMCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMQQEMCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.65

2.71

-3.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

0.50

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.62

-0.52

Drawdowns

EMQQ vs. EMCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than EMCR's maximum drawdown of -34.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and EMCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMQQEMCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.24%

-34.28%

-38.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.96%

-13.84%

-16.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.96%

-18.38%

-11.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.31%

-34.28%

-32.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.59%

0.00%

-56.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.35%

-9.34%

-22.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.93%

3.61%

+11.32%

Volatility

EMQQ vs. EMCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is 6.58%, while Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that EMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMQQEMCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

7.93%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.17%

16.84%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.46%

19.54%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.12%

19.28%

+13.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.60%

19.86%

+10.74%

EMQQ vs. EMCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCR's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMQQ vs. EMCR - Dividend Comparison

EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than EMCR's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMCR
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF
1.94%2.43%6.62%1.95%3.05%1.83%1.75%3.15%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
3.75%3.09%1.70%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.18%1.29%0.00%0.94%0.75%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMQQ and EMCR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMCR has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to EMQQ (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs EMCR's -34.28%.

On 5-year performance, EMCR leads with 9.54% vs -10.61% for EMQQ. On fees, EMCR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMCR has performed better with a 9.54% return vs -10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMCR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.

EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 1.94% for EMCR.

EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while EMCR tracks Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.15% for EMCR.

EMCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMQQ and EMCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer