EMQQ vs. EMCR
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and EMCR (Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMQQ tracks the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index while EMCR tracks the Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMQQ returned -10.61%/yr vs 9.54%/yr for EMCR. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMCR.
Performance
EMQQ vs. EMCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -17.59% return, which is significantly lower than EMCR's 24.88% return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -17.59%
- 6M
- -19.58%
- 1Y
- -13.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- -10.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
EMCR
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 9.77%
- YTD
- 24.88%
- 6M
- 27.30%
- 1Y
- 52.64%
- 3Y*
- 24.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ vs. EMCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -17.59% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 80.45% | 33.86% | -7.35% |
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 24.88% | 33.25% | 9.69% | 10.55% | -18.73% | 5.54% | 13.49% | 22.41% | -1.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and EMCR is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between EMQQ and EMCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMQQ vs. EMCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMQQ
EMCR
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMQQ
EMCR
Technology
EMQQ
EMCR
Communication Services
EMQQ
EMCR
Financial Services
EMQQ
EMCR
Real Estate
EMQQ
EMCR
Utilities
EMQQ
EMCR
Industrials
EMQQ
EMCR
Consumer Defensive
EMQQ
EMCR
Healthcare
EMQQ
EMCR
Basic Materials
EMQQ
-
EMCR
Energy
EMQQ
-
EMCR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. EMCR — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
EMCR
EMQQ vs. EMCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMQQ | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | 2.71 | -3.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | 3.48 | -4.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.50 | -0.59 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 3.87 | -4.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 14.84 | -15.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMQQ | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 | 2.71 | -3.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.50 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.62 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. EMCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than EMCR's maximum drawdown of -34.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and EMCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -34.28% | -38.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.96% | -13.84% | -16.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.96% | -18.38% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.31% | -34.28% | -32.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.59% | 0.00% | -56.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.35% | -9.34% | -22.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.93% | 3.61% | +11.32% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. EMCR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is 6.58%, while Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that EMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 7.93% | -1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 16.84% | -0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.46% | 19.54% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.12% | 19.28% | +13.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 19.86% | +10.74% |
EMQQ vs. EMCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. EMCR - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than EMCR's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 1.94% | 2.43% | 6.62% | 1.95% | 3.05% | 1.83% | 1.75% | 3.15% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 3.75% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and EMCR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMCR has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to EMQQ (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs EMCR's -34.28%.
On 5-year performance, EMCR leads with 9.54% vs -10.61% for EMQQ. On fees, EMCR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMCR has performed better with a 9.54% return vs -10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMCR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 1.94% for EMCR.
EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while EMCR tracks Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.15% for EMCR.
EMCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and EMCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer