EMQQ vs. CQQQ
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMQQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while CQQQ is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMQQ returned 4.32%/yr vs 5.85%/yr for CQQQ. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for CQQQ.
Performance
EMQQ vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -24.03% return, which is significantly lower than CQQQ's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, EMQQ has underperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 4.32%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 5.85% annualized return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -24.03%
- 6M
- -23.90%
- 1Y
- -21.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- -12.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
CQQQ
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 28.75%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- -7.83%
- 10Y*
- 5.85%
EMQQ vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -24.03% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 80.45% | 33.86% | -29.82% | 68.20% |
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 2.98% | 34.96% | 9.84% | -16.71% | -30.09% | -24.54% | 57.33% | 33.57% | -34.77% | 74.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and CQQQ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014 | 0.87 |
The correlation between EMQQ and CQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EMQQ vs. CQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMQQ
CQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMQQ
CQQQ
Technology
EMQQ
CQQQ
Communication Services
EMQQ
CQQQ
Financial Services
EMQQ
CQQQ
Real Estate
EMQQ
CQQQ
-
Utilities
EMQQ
CQQQ
-
Industrials
EMQQ
CQQQ
Consumer Defensive
EMQQ
CQQQ
-
Healthcare
EMQQ
CQQQ
-
Basic Materials
EMQQ
-
CQQQ
Energy
EMQQ
-
CQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
CQQQ
EMQQ vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMQQ | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.18 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 1.18 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 2.70 | -4.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, roughly equal to the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and CQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -73.99% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.55% | -24.41% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.55% | -35.93% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.31% | -66.96% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | -73.99% | +0.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.98% | -48.92% | -11.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.47% | -28.35% | -3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.56% | 10.68% | +5.88% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is 5.99%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 10.74%. This indicates that EMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 10.74% | -4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 23.33% | -6.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.77% | 30.65% | -9.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.14% | 38.16% | -5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.61% | 33.38% | -2.77% |
EMQQ vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than CQQQ's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 2.10% | 2.17% | 0.28% | 0.55% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.01% | 0.43% | 1.41% | 1.69% | 1.77% |
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 4.07% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and CQQQ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CQQQ has higher volatility (10.74%) compared to EMQQ (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs CQQQ's -73.99%.
On 10-year performance, CQQQ leads with 5.85% vs 4.32% for EMQQ. On fees, CQQQ is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CQQQ has performed better with a 5.85% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CQQQ is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 2.10% for CQQQ.
EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CQQQ is China Equities. EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while CQQQ tracks FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.70% for CQQQ.
CQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and CQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer