EMPB vs. CLIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EMPB (Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF) and CLIX (ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF) are both Long-Short funds. EMPB is actively managed, while CLIX is passively managed. Over the past year, EMPB returned 21.40% vs 16.32% for CLIX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMPB charges 1.82%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CLIX.

Performance

EMPB vs. CLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMPB achieves a 13.08% return, which is significantly higher than CLIX's -3.95% return.

EMPB

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 5.31%
• YTD: 13.08%
• 6M: 12.18%
• 1Y: 21.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLIX

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -3.59%
• YTD: -3.95%
• 6M: -4.31%
• 1Y: 16.32%
• 3Y*: 19.86%
• 5Y*: -5.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMPB vs. CLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMPB Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF	13.08%	14.84%	0.89%
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF	-3.95%	32.81%	-4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between EMPB and CLIX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024	0.45

Return for Risk

EMPB vs. CLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMPB

EMPB Risk / Return Rank: 58
EMPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
EMPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
EMPB Omega Ratio Rank: 56
EMPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
EMPB Martin Ratio Rank: 58

CLIX

CLIX Risk / Return Rank: 21
CLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
CLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
CLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMPB vs. CLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMPB	CLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	0.79	+1.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	1.19	+1.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.14	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	0.89	+2.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.38	2.44	+7.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMPB vs. CLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the CLIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMPB and CLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMPB	CLIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	0.79	+1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.73	0.18	+1.55

Drawdowns

EMPB vs. CLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMPB drawdown since its inception was -7.55%, smaller than the maximum CLIX drawdown of -73.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMPB and CLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMPB	CLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.55%	-73.21%	+65.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.98%	-19.57%	+13.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-68.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-43.26%	+42.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	-34.70%	+33.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	7.13%	-5.10%

Volatility

EMPB vs. CLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) is 2.57%, while ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that EMPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMPB	CLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.57%	4.75%	-2.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.47%	15.44%	-6.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.39%	20.77%	-9.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.83%	26.95%	-15.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.83%	25.92%	-14.09%

EMPB vs. CLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMPB has a 1.82% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMPB vs. CLIX - Dividend Comparison

EMPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than CLIX's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF	0.55%	0.46%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%
EMPB Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF	0.78%	0.88%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMPB and CLIX in my portfolio?

EMPB and CLIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMPB or CLIX?

CLIX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to EMPB (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMPB dropped -7.55% vs CLIX's -73.21%.

Which ETF is better, EMPB or CLIX?

On 1-year performance, EMPB leads with 21.40% vs 16.32% for CLIX. On fees, CLIX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, EMPB has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMPB or CLIX?

Over the 1-year period, EMPB has performed better with a 21.40% return vs 16.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMPB or CLIX?

CLIX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.82% for EMPB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMPB or CLIX?

EMPB has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.55% for CLIX.

What is the main difference between EMPB and CLIX?

They also come from different issuers: Empowered Funds and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.82% for EMPB and 0.65% for CLIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.