EMP-A.TO vs. OGC.TO
EMP-A.TO (Empire Company Limited) and OGC.TO (OceanaGold Corporation) are both stocks. EMP-A.TO operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while OGC.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, EMP-A.TO returned 11.41%/yr vs 9.02%/yr for OGC.TO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EMP-A.TO vs. OGC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMP-A.TO achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than OGC.TO's -19.37% return. Over the past 10 years, EMP-A.TO has outperformed OGC.TO with an annualized return of 11.41%, while OGC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.02% annualized return.
EMP-A.TO
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 12.37%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- -7.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.80%
OGC.TO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -14.87%
- 6M
- -32.52%
- YTD
- -19.37%
- 1Y
- 69.07%
- 3Y*
- 59.14%
- 5Y*
- 35.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.08%
EMP-A.TO vs. OGC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMP-A.TO Empire Company Limited | 7.91% | 10.63% | 27.94% | 0.17% | -5.96% | 12.40% | 15.98% | 7.18% | 19.80% | 59.11% |
OGC.TO OceanaGold Corporation | -19.37% | 227.48% | 57.16% | -1.22% | 17.27% | -10.57% | -3.53% | -48.74% | 54.71% | -17.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMP-A.TO and OGC.TO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2007 | 0.03 |
The correlation between EMP-A.TO and OGC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EMP-A.TO:
CA$11.43B
OGC.TO:
CA$6.98B
EMP-A.TO:
CA$0.86
OGC.TO:
$1.94
EMP-A.TO:
59.19
OGC.TO:
11.47
EMP-A.TO:
0.37
OGC.TO:
3.88
EMP-A.TO:
2.33
OGC.TO:
2.11
EMP-A.TO:
CA$31.97B
OGC.TO:
$2.25B
EMP-A.TO:
CA$8.69B
OGC.TO:
$1.24B
EMP-A.TO:
CA$1.77B
OGC.TO:
$1.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMP-A.TO vs. OGC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EMP-A.TO
OGC.TO
EMP-A.TO vs. OGC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Empire Company Limited (EMP-A.TO) and OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMP-A.TO | OGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.23 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 1.51 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 3.62 | -4.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMP-A.TO vs. OGC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMP-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -50.52%, smaller than the maximum OGC.TO drawdown of -96.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMP-A.TO and OGC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMP-A.TO | OGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.52% | -96.53% | +46.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.44% | -46.12% | +22.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.44% | -46.12% | +22.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.69% | -46.87% | +19.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.51% | -76.12% | +41.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.50% | -46.12% | +35.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -40.05% | +28.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.43% | 19.12% | -4.69% |
Volatility
EMP-A.TO vs. OGC.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Empire Company Limited (EMP-A.TO) is 7.61%, while OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) has a volatility of 11.54%. This indicates that EMP-A.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OGC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMP-A.TO | OGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 11.54% | -3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 41.95% | -24.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.51% | 52.35% | -28.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 49.91% | -29.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.84% | 52.54% | -26.70% |
Dividends
EMP-A.TO vs. OGC.TO - Dividend Comparison
EMP-A.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than OGC.TO's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMP-A.TO Empire Company Limited | 1.78% | 1.76% | 1.74% | 1.98% | 1.77% | 1.45% | 1.44% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.69% | 2.58% | 4.04% |
OGC.TO OceanaGold Corporation | 1.06% | 0.29% | 0.23% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.63% |
Financials
EMP-A.TO vs. OGC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Empire Company Limited and OceanaGold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EMP-A.TO vs. OGC.TO - Profitability Comparison
EMP-A.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Empire Company Limited reported a gross profit of 2.15B and revenue of 7.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
OGC.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported a gross profit of 397.08M and revenue of 702.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.5%.
EMP-A.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Empire Company Limited reported an operating income of 298.00M and revenue of 7.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
OGC.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported an operating income of 330.79M and revenue of 702.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.1%.
EMP-A.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Empire Company Limited reported a net income of 212.00M and revenue of 7.81B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
OGC.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported a net income of 224.66M and revenue of 702.79M, resulting in a net margin of 32.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMP-A.TO and OGC.TO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EMP-A.TO and OGC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer