EMP-A.TO vs. ATD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Empire Company Limited (EMP-A.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMP-A.TO or ATD.TO.
Key characteristics
EMP-A.TO | ATD.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | -2.59% | -3.04% |
1Y Return | -1.68% | 14.63% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -3.96% | 21.09% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 3.27% | 13.23% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 5.96% | 18.14% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.07 | 0.79 |
Daily Std Dev | 20.26% | 19.53% |
Max Drawdown | -67.32% | -100.00% |
Current Drawdown | -22.82% | -99.99% |
Fundamentals
EMP-A.TO | ATD.TO | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | CA$8.02B | CA$71.90B |
EPS | CA$3.02 | CA$4.16 |
PE Ratio | 10.87 | 17.97 |
Revenue (TTM) | CA$30.82B | CA$67.94B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$7.90B | CA$11.00B |
EBITDA (TTM) | CA$1.69B | CA$5.22B |
Correlation
The correlation between EMP-A.TO and ATD.TO is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EMP-A.TO vs. ATD.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EMP-A.TO achieves a -2.59% return, which is significantly higher than ATD.TO's -3.04% return. Over the past 10 years, EMP-A.TO has underperformed ATD.TO with an annualized return of 5.96%, while ATD.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.14% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMP-A.TO vs. ATD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Empire Company Limited (EMP-A.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMP-A.TO vs. ATD.TO - Dividend Comparison
EMP-A.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than ATD.TO's 0.83% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Empire Company Limited | 2.16% | 1.98% | 1.77% | 1.45% | 1.44% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.69% | 2.58% | 0.90% | 0.13% | 0.15% |
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 0.83% | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.69% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMP-A.TO vs. ATD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMP-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -67.32%, smaller than the maximum ATD.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMP-A.TO and ATD.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMP-A.TO vs. ATD.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Empire Company Limited (EMP-A.TO) is 3.79%, while Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that EMP-A.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
EMP-A.TO vs. ATD.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Empire Company Limited and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities