EMOP vs. EMXF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and EMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. EMOP is actively managed, while EMXF is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMOP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for EMXF.

Performance

EMOP vs. EMXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMOP achieves a 32.56% return, which is significantly higher than EMXF's 24.76% return.

EMOP

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 8.86%
• YTD: 32.56%
• 6M: 34.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMXF

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 8.70%
• YTD: 24.76%
• 6M: 27.57%
• 1Y: 47.21%
• 3Y*: 21.67%
• 5Y*: 7.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMOP vs. EMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	32.56%	16.69%
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF	24.76%	15.37%

Correlation

The correlation between EMOP and EMXF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.92

EMOP vs. EMXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMOP	EMXF
Technology	30.3%	35.2%
Financial Services	24.0%	32.2%
Communication Services	12.3%	8.0%
Industrials	8.1%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	5.7%
Basic Materials	7.0%	2.6%
Utilities	2.8%	0.6%
Energy	2.6%	0.0%
Real Estate	2.3%	1.7%
Healthcare	1.6%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	2.9%

Return for Risk

EMOP vs. EMXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXF

EMXF Risk / Return Rank: 77
EMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
EMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
EMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMOP vs. EMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMOP	EMXF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.93	0.51	+2.42

Drawdowns

EMOP vs. EMXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMOP drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, smaller than the maximum EMXF drawdown of -33.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMOP and EMXF.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMOP	EMXF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.88%	-33.13%	+20.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.53%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-1.30%	+0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.90%	-12.02%	+10.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMOP	EMXF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.13%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.85%	18.60%	+1.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.85%	22.15%	-2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.85%	21.77%	-1.92%

EMOP vs. EMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMOP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXF's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMOP vs. EMXF - Dividend Comparison

EMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than EMXF's 2.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.82%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF	2.75%	3.43%	2.92%	2.25%	2.42%	1.87%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMOP and EMXF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, EMOP and EMXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EMOP or EMXF?

On fees, EMXF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMOP or EMXF?

EMXF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for EMOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMOP or EMXF?

EMXF has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 0.82% for EMOP.

What is the main difference between EMOP and EMXF?

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for EMOP and 0.16% for EMXF.