EMOP vs. EDIV

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. EMOP is actively managed, while EDIV is passively managed. Over the past year, EMOP returned 36.54% vs 14.66% for EDIV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMOP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EDIV.

Performance

EMOP vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMOP achieves a 21.55% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 9.97% return.

EMOP

• 1D: -2.41%
• 1M: -6.04%
• 6M: 13.94%
• YTD: 21.55%
• 1Y: 36.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EDIV

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 1.84%
• 6M: 7.34%
• YTD: 9.97%
• 1Y: 14.66%
• 3Y*: 16.85%
• 5Y*: 12.10%
• 10Y*: 8.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMOP vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	21.55%	16.48%
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	9.97%	6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between EMOP and EDIV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.75

The correlation between EMOP and EDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMOP vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMOP	EDIV
Technology	45.9%	7.6%
Financial Services	15.4%	16.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	7.8%
Energy	7.9%	3.9%
Industrials	6.0%	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	9.4%
Healthcare	3.5%	0.1%
Communication Services	3.0%	5.2%
Utilities	2.8%	1.7%
Real Estate	2.4%	1.9%
Basic Materials	2.3%	0.9%

Return for Risk

EMOP vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMOP

EMOP Risk / Return Rank: 64
EMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
EMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
EMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 63
EMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
EMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 69

EDIV

EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 37
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 39
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMOP vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMOP	EDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.15	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	1.68	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.21	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	1.42	+1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.86	4.15	+5.71

EMOP vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMOP and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMOP vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMOP drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMOP and EDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMOP	EDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.88%	-53.36%	+40.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.88%	-10.36%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.02%	-0.86%	-8.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-19.24%	+17.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	3.54%	+0.17%

Volatility

EMOP vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) has a higher volatility of 9.06% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.02%. This indicates that EMOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMOP	EDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.06%	4.02%	+5.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.38%	11.06%	+9.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.44%	12.81%	+9.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.94%	13.95%	+7.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.94%	17.30%	+4.64%

EMOP vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMOP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMOP vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

EMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than EDIV's 4.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	4.13%	4.69%	3.94%	4.26%	4.94%	3.84%	3.52%	3.83%	3.41%	2.99%	4.94%	5.33%
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	1.22%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMOP and EDIV in my portfolio?

EMOP and EDIV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMOP or EDIV?

EMOP has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to EDIV (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMOP dropped -12.88% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

Which ETF is better, EMOP or EDIV?

On 1-year performance, EMOP leads with 36.54% vs 14.66% for EDIV. On fees, EDIV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMOP or EDIV?

Over the 1-year period, EMOP has performed better with a 36.54% return vs 14.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMOP or EDIV?

EDIV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for EMOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMOP or EDIV?

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 1.22% for EMOP.

What is the main difference between EMOP and EDIV?

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for EMOP and 0.49% for EDIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.