PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMNT vs. UESD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMNT vs. UESD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) and iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc (UESD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMNT is traded in USD, while UESD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the UESD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMNT achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly higher than UESD.L's 1.17% return.


EMNT

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.97%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*

UESD.L

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
1.17%
6M
2.46%
1Y
3.69%
3Y*
7.72%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMNT vs. UESD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMNT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF
1.64%4.74%5.79%5.84%-0.57%0.11%2.65%
UESD.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc
1.17%12.96%3.65%9.99%-9.31%-0.72%18.84%

Correlation

The correlation between EMNT and UESD.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2020

0.17

The correlation between EMNT and UESD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMNT vs. UESD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMNT
EMNT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
EMNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMNT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EMNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMNT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

UESD.L
UESD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
UESD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UESD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
UESD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
UESD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
UESD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMNT vs. UESD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) and iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc (UESD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMNTUESD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+10.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+20.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

5.63

1.10

+4.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

33.45

0.88

+32.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

235.99

1.96

+234.03

EMNT vs. UESD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMNT Sharpe Ratio is 10.63, which is higher than the UESD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMNT and UESD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMNTUESD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63

0.55

+10.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

4.18

0.29

+3.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.51

0.63

+2.88

Drawdowns

EMNT vs. UESD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMNT drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, smaller than the maximum UESD.L drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNT and UESD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMNTUESD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-24.57%

+22.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.13%

-4.20%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.73%

-8.03%

+7.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.70%

-24.57%

+22.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-1.60%

+1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-5.16%

+4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

1.88%

-1.86%

Volatility

EMNT vs. UESD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) is 0.14%, while iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc (UESD.L) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that EMNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UESD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMNTUESD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

1.70%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.34%

4.92%

-4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41%

6.68%

-6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.83%

8.64%

-7.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.86%

8.75%

-7.89%

EMNT vs. UESD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMNT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than UESD.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EMNT vs. UESD.L - Dividend Comparison

EMNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than UESD.L's 5.64% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EMNT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF
4.00%4.46%5.14%4.62%2.79%0.66%1.44%
UESD.L
iShares £ Ultrashort Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Inc
5.64%4.63%5.37%4.49%1.21%0.24%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMNT and UESD.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UESD.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UESD.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for EMNT.

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for EMNT and 0.09% for UESD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMNT and UESD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer