PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMNT vs. PAXHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMNT vs. PAXHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) and Pax High Yield Bond Fund (PAXHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMNT having a 1.64% return and PAXHX slightly higher at 1.72%.


EMNT

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.97%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*

PAXHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.72%
6M
2.43%
1Y
7.21%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
4.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMNT vs. PAXHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMNT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF
1.64%4.74%5.79%5.84%-0.57%0.11%2.08%0.09%
PAXHX
Pax High Yield Bond Fund
1.72%8.75%6.08%12.20%-13.52%2.55%7.83%0.99%

Correlation

The correlation between EMNT and PAXHX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2019

0.19

The correlation between EMNT and PAXHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMNT vs. PAXHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMNT
EMNT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
EMNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMNT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EMNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMNT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

PAXHX
PAXHX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PAXHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMNT vs. PAXHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) and Pax High Yield Bond Fund (PAXHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMNTPAXHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+17.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

5.63

1.52

+4.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

33.45

3.03

+30.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

235.99

14.74

+221.25

EMNT vs. PAXHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMNT Sharpe Ratio is 10.63, which is higher than the PAXHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMNT and PAXHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMNTPAXHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63

2.26

+8.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

4.18

0.59

+3.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.51

0.84

+2.67

Drawdowns

EMNT vs. PAXHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMNT drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, smaller than the maximum PAXHX drawdown of -25.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNT and PAXHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMNTPAXHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-25.81%

+23.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.13%

-2.45%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.73%

-3.85%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.70%

-17.38%

+15.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-4.69%

+4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

0.50%

-0.48%

Volatility

EMNT vs. PAXHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) is 0.14%, while Pax High Yield Bond Fund (PAXHX) has a volatility of 1.05%. This indicates that EMNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAXHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMNTPAXHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

1.05%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.34%

2.58%

-2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41%

3.28%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.83%

5.21%

-4.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.86%

5.26%

-4.40%

EMNT vs. PAXHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMNT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PAXHX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMNT vs. PAXHX - Dividend Comparison

EMNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than PAXHX's 5.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMNT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF
4.00%4.46%5.14%4.62%2.79%0.66%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAXHX
Pax High Yield Bond Fund
5.98%5.86%5.53%6.33%4.26%3.53%4.67%5.23%5.29%5.18%5.12%6.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMNT and PAXHX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAXHX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to EMNT (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMNT dropped -2.28% vs PAXHX's -25.81%.

EMNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.63 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMNT and PAXHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer