EMNT vs. LTPZ
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ).
EMNT and LTPZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMNT is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 10, 2019. LTPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). It was launched on Sep 3, 2009.
Performance
EMNT vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMNT vs. LTPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF | 0.97% | 4.74% | 5.79% | 5.84% | -0.57% | 0.11% | 2.08% | 0.09% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | -1.39% | 4.00% | -4.80% | 0.96% | -31.71% | 7.02% | 24.89% | -0.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMNT achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than LTPZ's -1.39% return.
EMNT
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.31%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- —
LTPZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.79%
- YTD
- -1.39%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- 1Y
- -2.68%
- 3Y*
- -2.37%
- 5Y*
- -4.68%
- 10Y*
- 0.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMNT vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMNT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EMNT vs. LTPZ — Risk / Return Rank
EMNT
LTPZ
EMNT vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMNT | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 11.02 | -0.24 | +11.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 23.01 | -0.24 | +23.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.88 | 0.97 | +4.91 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 34.06 | -0.21 | +34.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 226.92 | -0.43 | +227.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMNT | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.02 | -0.24 | +11.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 4.08 | -0.30 | +4.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.45 | 0.21 | +3.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMNT and LTPZ is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EMNT vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison
EMNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than LTPZ's 4.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF | 3.83% | 4.46% | 5.14% | 4.62% | 2.79% | 0.66% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 3.76% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
Drawdowns
EMNT vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMNT drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, smaller than the maximum LTPZ drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNT and LTPZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMNT | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -40.99% | +38.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.13% | -7.82% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.70% | -40.99% | +39.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -33.95% | +33.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -12.19% | +11.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 3.92% | -3.90% |
Volatility
EMNT vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) is 0.24%, while PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that EMNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMNT | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.24% | 3.99% | -3.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.29% | 6.46% | -6.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41% | 11.28% | -10.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.82% | 15.92% | -15.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.87% | 15.10% | -14.23% |