EMNJ.DE vs. SEC0.DE
EMNJ.DE (iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and SEC0.DE (iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EMNJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while SEC0.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMNJ.DE returned 16.68%/yr vs 53.79%/yr for SEC0.DE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMNJ.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SEC0.DE.
Performance
EMNJ.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMNJ.DE achieves a 19.97% return, which is significantly lower than SEC0.DE's 95.86% return.
EMNJ.DE
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 13.73%
- YTD
- 19.97%
- 1Y
- 39.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- —
SEC0.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- 6M
- 78.13%
- YTD
- 95.86%
- 1Y
- 153.47%
- 3Y*
- 53.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMNJ.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNJ.DE iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 19.97% | 12.87% | 10.79% | 16.08% | -13.34% | 4.75% |
SEC0.DE iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 95.86% | 36.46% | 20.85% | 61.01% | -32.22% | 21.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMNJ.DE and SEC0.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2021 | 0.54 |
The correlation between EMNJ.DE and SEC0.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMNJ.DE vs. SEC0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMNJ.DE
SEC0.DE
EMNJ.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE) and iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMNJ.DE | SEC0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.54 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 9.46 | -5.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.48 | 33.76 | -21.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMNJ.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMNJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, smaller than the maximum SEC0.DE drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNJ.DE and SEC0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMNJ.DE | SEC0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.10% | -39.35% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -16.33% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -39.35% | +22.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.74% | -12.12% | +9.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -11.74% | +5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 4.59% | -1.40% |
Volatility
EMNJ.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE) is 6.67%, while iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) has a volatility of 18.03%. This indicates that EMNJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEC0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMNJ.DE | SEC0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 18.03% | -11.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.64% | 31.56% | -14.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 38.17% | -17.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 31.03% | -14.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 31.03% | -12.77% |
EMNJ.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMNJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SEC0.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMNJ.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Dividend Comparison
EMNJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while SEC0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNJ.DE iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.42% | 1.58% | 1.80% | 1.75% | 2.16% | 1.66% | 1.63% | 1.72% |
SEC0.DE iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMNJ.DE and SEC0.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMNJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMNJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SEC0.DE.
EMNJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while SEC0.DE is Semiconductors. EMNJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while SEC0.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMNJ.DE and 0.35% for SEC0.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMNJ.DE and SEC0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer