PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMNJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMNJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMNJ.DE achieves a 19.97% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 21.93% return.


EMNJ.DE

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.81%
6M
13.73%
YTD
19.97%
1Y
39.88%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*

IS3N.DE

1D
-0.30%
1M
-4.79%
6M
14.75%
YTD
21.93%
1Y
36.45%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
8.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMNJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMNJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
19.97%12.87%10.79%16.08%-13.34%9.71%5.81%3.88%
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
21.93%17.14%13.88%7.20%-13.85%7.09%7.07%10.01%

Correlation

The correlation between EMNJ.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.56

The correlation between EMNJ.DE and IS3N.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (5 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMNJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMNJ.DE
EMNJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EMNJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMNJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMNJ.DEIS3N.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

3.45

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.48

10.72

+1.76

EMNJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMNJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMNJ.DE and IS3N.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMNJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMNJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNJ.DE and IS3N.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMNJ.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.10%

-35.06%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-10.52%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.91%

-19.18%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.91%

-21.99%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-7.75%

+5.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-9.23%

+2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

3.39%

-0.20%

Volatility

EMNJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE) is 6.67%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that EMNJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMNJ.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

8.26%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.64%

17.21%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.49%

19.58%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.02%

16.70%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

18.18%

+0.08%

EMNJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMNJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EMNJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison

EMNJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EMNJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.42%1.58%1.80%1.75%2.16%1.66%1.63%1.72%
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMNJ.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMNJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMNJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IS3N.DE.

EMNJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. EMNJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMNJ.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMNJ.DE and IS3N.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer