PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMNJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMNJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EMNJ.DE having a 19.97% return and QDVE.DE slightly lower at 19.81%.


EMNJ.DE

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.81%
6M
13.73%
YTD
19.97%
1Y
39.88%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*

QDVE.DE

1D
-0.94%
1M
-1.73%
6M
20.98%
YTD
19.81%
1Y
33.38%
3Y*
28.43%
5Y*
21.74%
10Y*
25.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMNJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMNJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
19.97%12.87%10.79%16.08%-13.34%9.71%5.81%3.88%
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
19.81%10.01%46.09%54.17%-25.82%46.74%29.67%33.16%

Correlation

The correlation between EMNJ.DE and QDVE.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.52

The correlation between EMNJ.DE and QDVE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMNJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMNJ.DE
EMNJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EMNJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVE.DE
QDVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMNJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMNJ.DEQDVE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

2.13

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.48

5.28

+7.20

EMNJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMNJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMNJ.DE and QDVE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMNJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMNJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, smaller than the maximum QDVE.DE drawdown of -31.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNJ.DE and QDVE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMNJ.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.10%

-31.40%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-15.60%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.91%

-29.81%

+12.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.91%

-29.81%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-6.39%

+3.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-5.80%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

6.31%

-3.12%

Volatility

EMNJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE) is 6.67%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that EMNJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMNJ.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

7.10%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.64%

16.44%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.49%

21.89%

-1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.02%

22.97%

-5.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

21.84%

-3.58%

EMNJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMNJ.DE and QDVE.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EMNJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Dividend Comparison

EMNJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while QDVE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EMNJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.42%1.58%1.80%1.75%2.16%1.66%1.63%1.72%
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMNJ.DE and QDVE.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMNJ.DE and QDVE.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

EMNJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while QDVE.DE is Technology Equities. EMNJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while QDVE.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMNJ.DE and QDVE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer