EMN vs. ^GSPC
EMN (Eastman Chemical Company) is a stock, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, EMN returned 3.93%/yr vs 13.88%/yr for ^GSPC. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
EMN vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMN achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 9.16% return. Over the past 10 years, EMN has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 3.93%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.88% annualized return.
EMN
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 15.38%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 1.74%
- 3Y*
- 1.12%
- 5Y*
- -5.82%
- 10Y*
- 3.93%
^GSPC
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 25.22%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.88%
EMN vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMN Eastman Chemical Company | 15.38% | -26.87% | 5.11% | 14.66% | -30.38% | 23.54% | 31.78% | 12.01% | -19.10% | 26.28% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 9.16% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -6.24% | 19.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMN and ^GSPC is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 1993 | 0.57 |
The correlation between EMN and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMN vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
EMN
^GSPC
EMN vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMN | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.37 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 2.78 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.11 | 12.44 | -12.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMN vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMN drawdown since its inception was -76.11%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMN and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMN | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.11% | -56.78% | -19.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.02% | -9.10% | -20.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.40% | -18.90% | -29.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.35% | -25.43% | -23.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.74% | -33.92% | -28.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.96% | -1.80% | -31.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.15% | -10.71% | -8.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.01% | 2.03% | +13.98% |
Volatility
EMN vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.67%. This indicates that EMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMN | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.73% | 4.67% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.57% | 9.84% | +13.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.78% | 12.50% | +26.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.11% | 16.99% | +15.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.88% | 18.11% | +13.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMN and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMN has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to ^GSPC (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMN dropped -76.11% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMN and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer