PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMN vs. SRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EMN vs. SRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Sempra Energy (SRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMN achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly higher than SRE's 4.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EMN has underperformed SRE with an annualized return of 3.93%, while SRE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.64% annualized return.


EMN

1D
-0.73%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
15.38%
6M
16.40%
1Y
1.74%
3Y*
1.12%
5Y*
-5.82%
10Y*
3.93%

SRE

1D
1.03%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
4.90%
6M
5.14%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
8.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMN vs. SRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company
15.38%-26.87%5.11%14.66%-30.38%23.54%31.78%12.01%-19.10%26.28%
SRE
Sempra Energy
4.90%3.94%21.11%-0.06%20.30%7.39%-12.78%44.01%4.49%9.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EMN and SRE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 1998

0.31

Fundamentals

EPS

EMN:

$4.61

SRE:

$3.17

PE Ratio

EMN:

15.62

SRE:

28.91

PS Ratio

EMN:

0.72

SRE:

4.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

EMN:

$8.64B

SRE:

$13.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EMN:

$1.71B

SRE:

$4.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

EMN:

$1.06B

SRE:

$4.51B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMN vs. SRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMN
EMN Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMN Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SRE
SRE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMN vs. SRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Sempra Energy (SRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMNSREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.25

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

2.22

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.11

6.07

-5.96

EMN vs. SRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the SRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMN and SRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMN vs. SRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMN drawdown since its inception was -76.11%, which is greater than SRE's maximum drawdown of -45.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMN and SRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMNSREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.11%

-45.00%

-31.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.02%

-12.65%

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.40%

-31.62%

-16.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.35%

-31.62%

-17.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.74%

-45.00%

-17.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.96%

-7.79%

-25.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.15%

-10.12%

-9.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.01%

4.62%

+11.39%

Volatility

EMN vs. SRE - Volatility Comparison

Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to Sempra Energy (SRE) at 6.33%. This indicates that EMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMNSREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.73%

6.33%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.57%

14.46%

+9.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.78%

19.71%

+19.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.11%

22.81%

+9.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.88%

24.90%

+6.98%

Dividends

EMN vs. SRE - Dividend Comparison

EMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than SRE's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company
4.66%5.22%3.57%3.54%3.77%2.34%2.66%3.18%3.15%2.26%2.51%2.46%
SRE
Sempra Energy
3.22%2.92%2.83%3.18%2.96%3.33%3.28%2.55%3.31%3.08%3.37%2.98%

Financials

EMN vs. SRE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eastman Chemical Company and Sempra Energy. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
2.18B
3.66B
(EMN) Total Revenue
(SRE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EMN vs. SRE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Eastman Chemical Company and Sempra Energy over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
19.8%
56.9%
Portfolio components
EMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eastman Chemical Company reported a gross profit of 431.00M and revenue of 2.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.

SRE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sempra Energy reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 3.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.

EMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eastman Chemical Company reported an operating income of 193.00M and revenue of 2.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.9%.

SRE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sempra Energy reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

EMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eastman Chemical Company reported a net income of 107.00M and revenue of 2.18B, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.

SRE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sempra Energy reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EMN and SRE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMN has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to SRE (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMN dropped -76.11% vs SRE's -45.00%.

SRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMN and SRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer