EMN vs. ALB
Compare and contrast key facts about Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMN or ALB.
Correlation
The correlation between EMN and ALB is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EMN vs. ALB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EMN:
0.55
ALB:
-0.31
EMN:
0.91
ALB:
-0.08
EMN:
1.11
ALB:
0.99
EMN:
0.40
ALB:
-0.23
EMN:
1.61
ALB:
-0.66
EMN:
7.73%
ALB:
27.23%
EMN:
22.77%
ALB:
57.65%
EMN:
-76.11%
ALB:
-77.22%
EMN:
-18.90%
ALB:
-69.26%
Fundamentals
EMN:
$10.80B
ALB:
$11.46B
EMN:
$7.46
ALB:
-$17.32
EMN:
1.33
ALB:
8.71
EMN:
$7.13B
ALB:
$4.15B
EMN:
$1.75B
ALB:
-$78.57M
EMN:
$1.37B
ALB:
-$1.29B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMN achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than ALB's 13.26% return. Over the past 10 years, EMN has underperformed ALB with an annualized return of 6.10%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively higher 6.86% annualized return.
EMN
2.07%
2.48%
-2.47%
10.77%
7.39%
6.10%
ALB
13.26%
7.68%
6.77%
-16.09%
4.97%
6.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMN vs. ALB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EMN
ALB
EMN vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMN vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison
EMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than ALB's 1.65% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMN Eastman Chemical Company | 3.50% | 3.57% | 3.54% | 3.77% | 2.34% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 2.26% | 2.51% | 2.46% | 1.91% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.65% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.02% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% | 1.83% |
Drawdowns
EMN vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMN drawdown since its inception was -76.11%, roughly equal to the maximum ALB drawdown of -77.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMN and ALB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMN vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) is 7.79%, while Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that EMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
EMN vs. ALB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eastman Chemical Company and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities