PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EMN vs. ALB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

EMN vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%3,000.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1,170.90%
2,309.52%
EMN
ALB

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMN achieves a 15.97% return, which is significantly higher than ALB's -27.52% return. Over the past 10 years, EMN has underperformed ALB with an annualized return of 4.78%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively higher 6.85% annualized return.


EMN

YTD

15.97%

1M

-6.64%

6M

2.86%

1Y

28.94%

5Y (annualized)

8.98%

10Y (annualized)

4.78%

ALB

YTD

-27.52%

1M

8.82%

6M

-20.38%

1Y

-17.56%

5Y (annualized)

10.56%

10Y (annualized)

6.85%

Fundamentals


EMNALB
Market Cap$11.65B$12.08B
EPS$7.46-$16.76
PEG Ratio1.451.22
Total Revenue (TTM)$9.34B$6.50B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.20B$689.47M
EBITDA (TTM)$1.69B-$1.93B

Key characteristics


EMNALB
Sharpe Ratio1.36-0.30
Sortino Ratio1.96-0.05
Omega Ratio1.240.99
Calmar Ratio0.92-0.23
Martin Ratio6.10-0.62
Ulcer Index4.85%28.77%
Daily Std Dev21.75%59.09%
Max Drawdown-76.11%-77.22%
Current Drawdown-12.34%-67.48%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between EMN and ALB is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EMN vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EMN, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.36-0.30
The chart of Sortino ratio for EMN, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.96-0.05
The chart of Omega ratio for EMN, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.240.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for EMN, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.92-0.23
The chart of Martin ratio for EMN, currently valued at 6.10, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.10-0.62
EMN
ALB

The current EMN Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the ALB Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMN and ALB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.36
-0.30
EMN
ALB

Dividends

EMN vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

EMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than ALB's 1.55% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company
3.19%3.54%3.77%2.34%2.66%3.18%3.15%2.26%2.51%2.46%1.91%1.55%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
1.55%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.02%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%1.83%1.51%

Drawdowns

EMN vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMN drawdown since its inception was -76.11%, roughly equal to the maximum ALB drawdown of -77.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMN and ALB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-12.34%
-67.48%
EMN
ALB

Volatility

EMN vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) is 6.37%, while Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a volatility of 17.29%. This indicates that EMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.37%
17.29%
EMN
ALB

Financials

EMN vs. ALB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eastman Chemical Company and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items