PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMMF vs. IDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMMF vs. IDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMMF achieves a 28.01% return, which is significantly higher than IDX's -35.74% return.


EMMF

1D
-0.96%
1M
11.20%
YTD
28.01%
6M
29.54%
1Y
49.05%
3Y*
24.00%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*

IDX

1D
-4.67%
1M
-17.75%
YTD
-35.74%
6M
-36.84%
1Y
-25.49%
3Y*
-13.44%
5Y*
-8.94%
10Y*
-4.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMMF vs. IDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMMF
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
28.01%21.22%9.45%20.59%-13.47%5.97%9.25%2.30%-6.64%
IDX
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF
-35.74%13.83%-9.75%1.98%-9.40%-2.59%-7.45%6.26%2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EMMF and IDX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2018

0.56

The correlation between EMMF and IDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMMF vs. IDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMMF
IDX

Technology

32.9%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
0.5%

Financial Services

8.2%
25.1%

Communication Services

6.6%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
9.0%

Industrials

3.8%
7.4%

Energy

2.1%
12.5%

Utilities

2.0%
5.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
25.2%

Healthcare

0.3%
1.8%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

EMMF
32.9%
IDX
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EMMF
14.0%
IDX
0.5%

Financial Services

EMMF
8.2%
IDX
25.1%

Communication Services

EMMF
6.6%
IDX
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

EMMF
4.4%
IDX
9.0%

Industrials

EMMF
3.8%
IDX
7.4%

Energy

EMMF
2.1%
IDX
12.5%

Utilities

EMMF
2.0%
IDX
5.2%

Basic Materials

EMMF
1.9%
IDX
25.2%

Healthcare

EMMF
0.3%
IDX
1.8%

Real Estate

EMMF

-

IDX
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMMF vs. IDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMMF
EMMF Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IDX
IDX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
IDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMMF vs. IDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMMFIDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

0.82

+0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.64

-0.67

+5.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.15

-1.99

+21.14

EMMF vs. IDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the IDX Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMMF and IDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMMFIDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.98

-1.02

+4.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

-0.44

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.14

+0.40

Drawdowns

EMMF vs. IDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMMF drawdown since its inception was -32.57%, smaller than the maximum IDX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMMF and IDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMMFIDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.57%

-63.14%

+30.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-38.42%

+27.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.02%

-40.88%

+24.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.99%

-45.90%

+20.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-56.42%

+55.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-24.83%

+17.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

12.84%

-10.27%

Volatility

EMMF vs. IDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) is 7.23%, while VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that EMMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMMFIDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

9.05%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.46%

22.03%

-7.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.57%

25.04%

-8.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

20.42%

-6.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

24.31%

-7.69%

EMMF vs. IDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMMF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than IDX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMMF vs. IDX - Dividend Comparison

EMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than IDX's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMMF
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
1.85%2.45%1.30%1.62%3.48%2.64%1.93%2.93%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDX
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF
3.24%2.08%4.01%3.62%3.64%1.08%1.66%2.21%2.19%1.85%1.16%2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMMF and IDX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDX has higher volatility (9.05%) compared to EMMF (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMMF dropped -32.57% vs IDX's -63.14%.

On 5-year performance, EMMF leads with 10.81% vs -8.94% for IDX. On fees, EMMF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EMMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMMF has performed better with a 10.81% return vs -8.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMMF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for IDX.

IDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 1.85% for EMMF.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EMMF and 0.57% for IDX.

EMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMMF and IDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer