EMMF vs. EMDM

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

EMMF (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund) and EMDM (First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. EMMF is actively managed, while EMDM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMMF returned 19.00%/yr vs 29.08%/yr for EMDM. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EMMF charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for EMDM.

Performance

EMMF vs. EMDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMMF achieves a 19.56% return, which is significantly lower than EMDM's 31.45% return.

EMMF

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -2.59%
• 6M: 11.17%
• YTD: 19.56%
• 1Y: 32.75%
• 3Y*: 19.00%
• 5Y*: 10.50%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.89%

EMDM

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -4.02%
• 6M: 14.67%
• YTD: 31.45%
• 1Y: 67.48%
• 3Y*: 29.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF	$396.72K	$684.93K	$527.74K
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund	$651.32K	$529.10K	$571.40K

EMMF vs. EMDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund	19.56%	21.22%	9.45%	17.39%
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF	31.45%	59.68%	-4.93%	14.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EMMF and EMDM is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2023	0.86

The correlation between EMMF and EMDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMMF vs. EMDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMMF	EMDM
Technology	39.6%	39.9%
Industrials	12.4%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	5.3%
Financial Services	8.5%	25.6%
Basic Materials	8.0%	12.7%
Communication Services	6.8%	4.0%
Healthcare	4.5%	0.5%
Energy	3.3%	4.8%
Utilities	2.9%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	3.1%
Real Estate	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

EMMF vs. EMDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMMF

EMMF Risk / Return Rank: 57
EMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
EMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 62
EMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
EMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 59

EMDM

EMDM Risk / Return Rank: 87
EMDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
EMDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
EMDM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
EMDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
EMDM Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMMF vs. EMDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMMF	EMDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	2.43	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.96	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.42	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	4.33	-2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.96	13.59	-5.63

EMMF vs. EMDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the EMDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMMF and EMDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMMF vs. EMDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMMF drawdown since its inception was -32.57%, which is greater than EMDM's maximum drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMMF and EMDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMMF	EMDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.57%	-18.81%	-13.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.40%	-15.65%	+1.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.02%	-18.81%	+2.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.72%	-8.38%	+0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.45%	-4.22%	-3.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.13%	4.98%	-0.85%

Volatility

EMMF vs. EMDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) is 7.81%, while First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a volatility of 9.12%. This indicates that EMMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMMF	EMDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.81%	9.12%	-1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.43%	25.38%	-5.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.99%	27.92%	-6.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.46%	21.16%	-5.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.12%	21.16%	-4.04%

EMMF vs. EMDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMMF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDM's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMMF vs. EMDM - Dividend Comparison

EMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than EMDM's 2.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF	2.88%	3.57%	5.87%	2.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund	1.98%	2.45%	1.30%	1.62%	3.48%	2.64%	1.93%	2.93%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMMF and EMDM in my portfolio?

EMMF and EMDM have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMMF or EMDM?

EMDM has higher volatility (9.12%) compared to EMMF (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMMF dropped -32.57% vs EMDM's -18.81%.

Which ETF is better, EMMF or EMDM?

On 3-year performance, EMDM leads with 29.08% vs 19.00% for EMMF. On fees, EMMF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EMMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMMF or EMDM?

Over the 3-year period, EMDM has performed better with a 29.08% return vs 19.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMMF or EMDM?

EMMF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMDM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMMF or EMDM?

EMDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 1.98% for EMMF.

What is the main difference between EMMF and EMDM?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EMMF and 0.75% for EMDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.