EMMF vs. AAXJ
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ).
EMMF and AAXJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMMF is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Aug 10, 2018. AAXJ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2008.
Performance
EMMF vs. AAXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMMF vs. AAXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 5.23% | 21.22% | 9.45% | 20.59% | -13.47% | 5.97% | 9.25% | 2.30% | -6.64% |
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 3.40% | 31.53% | 10.41% | 4.79% | -20.35% | -5.73% | 23.35% | 17.93% | -9.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMMF achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly higher than AAXJ's 3.40% return.
EMMF
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- —
AAXJ
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -9.67%
- YTD
- 3.40%
- 6M
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- 32.66%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMMF vs. AAXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMMF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than AAXJ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMMF vs. AAXJ — Risk / Return Rank
EMMF
AAXJ
EMMF vs. AAXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMMF | AAXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.66 | 1.58 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 2.18 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.31 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.37 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.52 | 9.05 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMMF | AAXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.58 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.13 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.23 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMMF and AAXJ is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMMF vs. AAXJ - Dividend Comparison
EMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than AAXJ's 1.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 2.25% | 2.45% | 1.30% | 1.62% | 3.48% | 2.64% | 1.93% | 2.93% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 1.75% | 1.81% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.74% | 2.21% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.77% | 2.44% |
Drawdowns
EMMF vs. AAXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMMF drawdown since its inception was -32.57%, smaller than the maximum AAXJ drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMMF and AAXJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMMF | AAXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.57% | -49.37% | +16.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.62% | -13.66% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.20% | -41.04% | +15.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.68% | -10.59% | +2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -14.15% | +6.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 3.57% | -0.96% |
Volatility
EMMF vs. AAXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) is 9.11%, while iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) has a volatility of 10.24%. This indicates that EMMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMMF | AAXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.11% | 10.24% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 15.04% | -2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.91% | 20.71% | -3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.01% | 19.42% | -5.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 20.01% | -3.56% |