EMKT vs. MLPB
EMKT (Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B) are both exchange-traded funds - EMKT is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Lazard, while MLPB is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. EMKT is actively managed, while MLPB is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. EMKT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MLPB.
Performance
EMKT vs. MLPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EMKT having a 23.70% return and MLPB slightly lower at 22.83%.
EMKT
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- 6M
- 19.09%
- YTD
- 23.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPB
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 3.60%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- YTD
- 22.83%
- 1Y
- 23.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.97%
- 5Y*
- 21.32%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
EMKT vs. MLPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 23.70% | -1.26% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 22.83% | 3.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMKT and MLPB is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMKT vs. MLPB — Risk / Return Rank
EMKT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MLPB
EMKT vs. MLPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMKT | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMKT vs. MLPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMKT drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum MLPB drawdown of -71.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKT and MLPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMKT | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.21% | -71.93% | +57.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.90% | -2.22% | -4.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -14.73% | +11.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.71% | — |
Volatility
EMKT vs. MLPB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMKT | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.42% | 14.16% | +11.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.42% | 19.86% | +5.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.42% | 27.19% | -1.77% |
EMKT vs. MLPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMKT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMKT vs. MLPB - Dividend Comparison
EMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than MLPB's 5.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 5.87% | 6.51% | 5.95% | 6.37% | 6.00% | 6.98% | 11.93% | 7.98% | 8.11% | 7.23% | 6.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMKT and MLPB have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMKT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMKT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MLPB.
MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 0.45% for EMKT.
EMKT is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while MLPB is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Lazard and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EMKT and 0.85% for MLPB.
Find the right allocation for EMKT and MLPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer