EMKT vs. EIPI
EMKT (Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and EIPI (FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMKT is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Lazard, while EIPI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. EMKT charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for EIPI.
Performance
EMKT vs. EIPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMKT achieves a 25.98% return, which is significantly higher than EIPI's 13.41% return.
EMKT
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 25.98%
- 6M
- 26.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EIPI
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- YTD
- 13.41%
- 6M
- 14.04%
- 1Y
- 19.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMKT vs. EIPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 25.98% | -1.26% |
EIPI FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF | 13.41% | 2.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMKT and EIPI is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMKT vs. EIPI — Risk / Return Rank
EMKT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EIPI
EMKT vs. EIPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMKT | EIPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMKT vs. EIPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMKT drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, which is greater than EIPI's maximum drawdown of -12.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKT and EIPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMKT | EIPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.21% | -12.33% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.18% | -3.58% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -1.70% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.52% | — |
Volatility
EMKT vs. EIPI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMKT | EIPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.64% | 9.73% | +14.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 13.03% | +11.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 13.03% | +11.61% |
EMKT vs. EIPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMKT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPI's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMKT vs. EIPI - Dividend Comparison
EMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than EIPI's 6.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EIPI FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF | 6.85% | 9.71% | 6.31% |
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMKT and EIPI have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMKT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMKT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for EIPI.
EIPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.85%, compared with 0.44% for EMKT.
EMKT is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while EIPI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Lazard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EMKT and 1.11% for EIPI.
Find the right allocation for EMKT and EIPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer