EMIM.L vs. 1810.HK
EMIM.L (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while 1810.HK (Xiaomi Corp) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, EMIM.L returned 8.57%/yr vs -0.59%/yr for 1810.HK. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EMIM.L vs. 1810.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMIM.L is traded in GBp, while 1810.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1810.HK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMIM.L achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than 1810.HK's -33.45% return.
EMIM.L
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 22.83%
- 6M
- 25.36%
- 1Y
- 46.92%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
1810.HK
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -17.45%
- YTD
- -33.45%
- 6M
- -39.56%
- 1Y
- -48.84%
- 3Y*
- 31.08%
- 5Y*
- -0.59%
- 10Y*
- —
EMIM.L vs. 1810.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 22.83% | 23.35% | 9.18% | 4.93% | -10.17% | 0.74% | 14.91% | 12.69% | -3.93% |
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp | -33.45% | 5.62% | 126.16% | 35.49% | -35.35% | -42.59% | 199.04% | -19.32% | -18.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMIM.L and 1810.HK is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2018 | 0.39 |
The correlation between EMIM.L and 1810.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMIM.L vs. 1810.HK — Risk / Return Rank
EMIM.L
1810.HK
EMIM.L vs. 1810.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMIM.L | 1810.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 0.75 | +0.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | -0.87 | +4.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.02 | -1.49 | +15.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMIM.L vs. 1810.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMIM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum 1810.HK drawdown of -71.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIM.L and 1810.HK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMIM.L | 1810.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -71.51% | +39.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | -57.09% | +46.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | -57.33% | +41.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | -64.50% | +42.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -56.69% | +53.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -40.74% | +32.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 33.01% | -29.81% |
Volatility
EMIM.L vs. 1810.HK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) is 7.38%, while Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that EMIM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1810.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMIM.L | 1810.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 8.75% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.94% | 25.48% | -10.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.33% | 35.05% | -17.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 44.06% | -28.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 45.51% | -27.65% |
Dividends
EMIM.L vs. 1810.HK - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMIM.L nor 1810.HK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMIM.L and 1810.HK have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EMIM.L and 1810.HK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer