PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EMIF vs. QAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EMIF vs. QAT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EMIF (iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF) and QAT (iShares MSCI Qatar ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares - EMIF tracks the S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index while QAT tracks the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMIF returned 2.41%/yr vs 4.43%/yr for QAT. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMIF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for QAT.

Performance

EMIF vs. QAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMIF achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly higher than QAT's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, EMIF has underperformed QAT with an annualized return of 2.41%, while QAT has yielded a comparatively higher 4.43% annualized return.

EMIF

1D
-0.50%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
1.13%
6M
-0.46%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
11.63%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
2.41%

QAT

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.08%
YTD
1.01%
6M
0.41%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
4.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMIF vs. QAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMIF
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF		1.13%33.90%1.21%5.67%-12.59%3.76%-19.98%16.36%-13.70%20.70%
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF		1.01%8.81%5.20%2.72%-7.23%14.42%6.94%-0.44%20.03%-11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EMIF and QAT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2014

0.28

EMIF vs. QAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EMIF
QAT

Industrials

42.0%
8.4%

Utilities

38.7%
2.5%

Energy

19.3%
7.6%

Basic Materials

-

12.6%

Communication Services

-

6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

55.5%

Healthcare

-

0.8%

Real Estate

-

4.0%

Technology

-

1.0%

Industrials

EMIF
42.0%
QAT
8.4%

Utilities

EMIF
38.7%
QAT
2.5%

Energy

EMIF
19.3%
QAT
7.6%

Basic Materials

EMIF

-

QAT
12.6%

Communication Services

EMIF

-

QAT
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EMIF

-

QAT
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

EMIF

-

QAT
0.6%

Financial Services

EMIF

-

QAT
55.5%

Healthcare

EMIF

-

QAT
0.8%

Real Estate

EMIF

-

QAT
4.0%

Technology

EMIF

-

QAT
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF

iShares MSCI Qatar ETF

Often compared with EMIF:
EMIF vs. SPYEMIF vs. IVVEMIF vs. BNEMIF vs. VDCEMIF vs. IYKEMIF vs. JXIEMIF vs. UTES
Often compared with QAT:
QAT vs. UAEQAT vs. KSAQAT vs. ENORQAT vs. SJMQAT vs. EDENQAT vs. VOOQAT vs. EIRL

Return for Risk

EMIF vs. QAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EMIF
EMIF Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EMIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIF Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIF Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
QAT
QAT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
QAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
QAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMIF vs. QAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EMIFQATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.28
0.54

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.88
0.87

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.11

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

0.67

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.91

1.24

+2.67

EMIF vs. QAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the QAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMIF and QAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMIF vs. QAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMIF drawdown since its inception was -48.02%, which is greater than QAT's maximum drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIF and QAT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EMIFQATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.02%

-45.21%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.57%

-10.60%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

-17.41%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.29%

-33.17%

+9.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.02%

-34.04%

-13.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.97%

-11.55%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

-19.14%

+3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

5.75%

-0.51%

Volatility

EMIF vs. QAT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) have volatilities of 5.59% and 5.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EMIFQATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

5.72%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

11.06%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

13.25%

+2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.74%

15.06%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

17.54%

+3.04%

EMIF vs. QAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMIF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QAT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMIF vs. QAT - Dividend Comparison

EMIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than QAT's 4.63% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMIF
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF		4.18%4.96%4.12%2.64%3.08%3.94%2.54%2.07%2.64%2.58%3.16%2.07%
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF		4.63%3.51%5.90%3.92%4.78%2.33%2.63%3.57%4.63%4.10%3.51%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

EMIF and QAT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QAT has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to EMIF (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMIF dropped -48.02% vs QAT's -45.21%.

On 10-year performance, QAT leads with 4.43% vs 2.41% for EMIF. On fees, QAT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EMIF has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QAT has performed better with a 4.43% return vs 2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QAT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMIF.

QAT has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 4.18% for EMIF.

EMIF tracks S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index, while QAT tracks MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMIF and 0.59% for QAT.

EMIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMIF and QAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer