PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMHY vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMHY vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMHY achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, EMHY has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 4.73%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


EMHY

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.38%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.49%
1Y
12.96%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
4.73%

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMHY vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
2.80%13.70%11.97%11.47%-13.03%-1.91%3.83%12.98%-5.21%8.54%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EMHY and IVV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2012

0.46

The correlation between EMHY and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMHY vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMHY
IVV

Industrials

100.0%
8.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Industrials

EMHY
100.0%
IVV
8.3%

Basic Materials

EMHY

-

IVV
1.8%

Communication Services

EMHY

-

IVV
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EMHY

-

IVV
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

EMHY

-

IVV
4.9%

Energy

EMHY

-

IVV
3.5%

Financial Services

EMHY

-

IVV
11.8%

Healthcare

EMHY

-

IVV
8.5%

Real Estate

EMHY

-

IVV
1.9%

Technology

EMHY

-

IVV
35.6%

Utilities

EMHY

-

IVV
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMHY vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMHY
EMHY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EMHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EMHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMHY vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMHYIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.43

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.17

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.63

14.71

-1.08

EMHY vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMHY and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMHYIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.39

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.83

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.86

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.45

+0.05

Drawdowns

EMHY vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMHY drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHY and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMHYIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-55.25%

+25.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.34%

-8.89%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.95%

-18.75%

+12.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.83%

-24.53%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.11%

-33.90%

+3.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.76%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-10.78%

+5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.91%

-0.96%

Volatility

EMHY vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) is 1.66%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that EMHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMHYIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

2.87%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.31%

8.90%

-4.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.65%

11.80%

-6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.10%

16.88%

-7.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.66%

18.05%

-7.39%

EMHY vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMHY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMHY vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

EMHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
6.41%6.52%6.86%6.73%7.08%5.58%5.44%5.72%6.79%5.59%6.43%6.99%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMHY and IVV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to EMHY (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMHY dropped -30.11% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.54% vs 4.73% for EMHY. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EMHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.54% return vs 4.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMHY.

EMHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.41%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

EMHY is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while IVV is S&P 500. EMHY tracks J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets High Yield Bond Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EMHY and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMHY and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer