PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMGF vs. AVEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMGF vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMGF achieves a 30.01% return, which is significantly higher than AVEM's 27.59% return.


EMGF

1D
-1.20%
1M
9.65%
YTD
30.01%
6M
32.52%
1Y
55.31%
3Y*
26.88%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
11.48%

AVEM

1D
-1.39%
1M
8.65%
YTD
27.59%
6M
29.75%
1Y
55.00%
3Y*
26.07%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMGF vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMGF
iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
30.01%31.41%9.06%10.86%-16.55%6.65%10.27%12.04%
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
27.59%34.48%7.49%15.30%-18.15%5.16%14.39%11.13%

Correlation

The correlation between EMGF and AVEM is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019

0.97

The correlation between EMGF and AVEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMGF vs. AVEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMGF
AVEM

Technology

34.7%
32.3%

Financial Services

19.2%
20.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
9.2%

Industrials

7.8%
9.2%

Communication Services

7.4%
5.4%

Basic Materials

5.8%
8.1%

Energy

4.3%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
3.1%

Healthcare

2.9%
2.8%

Utilities

2.5%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.6%

Technology

EMGF
34.7%
AVEM
32.3%

Financial Services

EMGF
19.2%
AVEM
20.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EMGF
10.4%
AVEM
9.2%

Industrials

EMGF
7.8%
AVEM
9.2%

Communication Services

EMGF
7.4%
AVEM
5.4%

Basic Materials

EMGF
5.8%
AVEM
8.1%

Energy

EMGF
4.3%
AVEM
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

EMGF
3.8%
AVEM
3.1%

Healthcare

EMGF
2.9%
AVEM
2.8%

Utilities

EMGF
2.5%
AVEM
2.6%

Real Estate

EMGF
1.1%
AVEM
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMGF vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMGF
EMGF Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EMGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMGF Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EMGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMGF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEM
AVEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AVEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMGF vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMGFAVEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.51

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

4.21

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.84

16.70

-0.85

EMGF vs. AVEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMGF Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the AVEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMGF and AVEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMGFAVEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

2.84

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.54

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.66

-0.09

Drawdowns

EMGF vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMGF drawdown since its inception was -40.23%, which is greater than AVEM's maximum drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGF and AVEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMGFAVEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.23%

-36.05%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.54%

-13.13%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.65%

-18.02%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.60%

-34.00%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-1.39%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-10.09%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.30%

+0.20%

Volatility

EMGF vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) has a higher volatility of 9.20% compared to Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) at 8.33%. This indicates that EMGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMGFAVEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.20%

8.33%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.50%

16.72%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.99%

19.45%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

18.34%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.48%

20.55%

-1.07%

EMGF vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMGF vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison

EMGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than AVEM's 1.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.98%2.45%3.17%3.06%2.77%2.61%1.60%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMGF
iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
1.94%2.52%3.42%5.94%4.04%2.48%1.95%2.63%2.73%1.94%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, EMGF and AVEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EMGF has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to AVEM (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMGF dropped -40.23% vs AVEM's -36.05%.

On 5-year performance, EMGF leads with 10.38% vs 9.92% for AVEM. On fees, AVEM is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, AVEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMGF has performed better with a 10.38% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVEM is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EMGF.

AVEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.94% for EMGF.

EMGF is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AVEM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EMGF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index, while AVEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EMGF and 0.33% for AVEM.

AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMGF and AVEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer