EMGA.L vs. EMSA.L
EMGA.L (iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EMSA.L (iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds from iShares - EMGA.L tracks the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD while EMSA.L tracks the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMGA.L returned 1.03%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for EMSA.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMGA.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EMSA.L.
Performance
EMGA.L vs. EMSA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMGA.L achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than EMSA.L's 1.61% return.
EMGA.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- 8.91%
- 3Y*
- 7.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.03%
- 10Y*
- —
EMSA.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 10.63%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- —
EMGA.L vs. EMSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGA.L iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.79% | 18.25% | -2.74% | 11.65% | -10.95% | -10.50% | 1.84% | 11.71% | 2.43% |
EMSA.L iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.61% | 13.11% | 5.32% | 9.71% | -18.78% | -3.11% | 6.03% | 15.79% | -0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMGA.L and EMSA.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018 | 0.58 |
The correlation between EMGA.L and EMSA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMGA.L vs. EMSA.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMGA.L
EMSA.L
EMGA.L vs. EMSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMGA.L | EMSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.37 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.47 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.01 | 10.09 | -5.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMGA.L | EMSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.93 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.16 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.33 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
EMGA.L vs. EMSA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMGA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.18%, roughly equal to the maximum EMSA.L drawdown of -29.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGA.L and EMSA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMGA.L | EMSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.18% | -29.12% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.93% | -4.29% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.12% | -7.28% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.60% | -28.91% | +2.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -0.22% | -2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -8.06% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.05% | +0.73% |
Volatility
EMGA.L vs. EMSA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L) at 2.09%. This indicates that EMGA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMGA.L | EMSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.09% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.52% | 4.47% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.49% | 5.49% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.03% | 8.46% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.24% | 9.76% | +0.48% |
EMGA.L vs. EMSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMGA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EMSA.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMGA.L vs. EMSA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMGA.L nor EMSA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMGA.L and EMSA.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMSA.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMSA.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMGA.L.
EMGA.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while EMSA.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EMGA.L and 0.45% for EMSA.L.
Find the right allocation for EMGA.L and EMSA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer