PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMGA.L vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMGA.L vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMGA.L vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMGA.L
iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-2.64%18.25%-2.74%11.65%-10.95%-10.50%1.84%11.71%-2.92%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
8.57%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-0.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMGA.L achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 8.57% return.


EMGA.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-5.82%
YTD
-2.64%
6M
0.55%
1Y
11.01%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
1.38%
10Y*

GLD

1D
3.79%
1M
-11.05%
YTD
8.57%
6M
21.05%
1Y
49.33%
3Y*
32.92%
5Y*
21.58%
10Y*
13.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMGA.L vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMGA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMGA.L vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMGA.L
EMGA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EMGA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMGA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMGA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EMGA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMGA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMGA.L vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMGA.LGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

1.79

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.11

2.21

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.68

-0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.71

9.90

-2.19

EMGA.L vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMGA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMGA.L and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMGA.LGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.79

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

1.22

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.62

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between EMGA.L and GLD is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EMGA.L vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMGA.L nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EMGA.L vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMGA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.18%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGA.L and GLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMGA.LGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.18%

-45.56%

+17.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.93%

-19.21%

+13.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.60%

-21.03%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.84%

-13.23%

+7.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-16.17%

+7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

5.20%

-3.79%

Volatility

EMGA.L vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L) is 3.94%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 11.06%. This indicates that EMGA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMGA.LGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

11.06%

-7.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.17%

24.30%

-19.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.20%

27.80%

-20.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.90%

17.74%

-8.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.23%

15.87%

-5.64%