EMET vs. KCOP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EMET (VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF) and KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) are both Copper funds. EMET is passively managed, while KCOP is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMET charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for KCOP.

Performance

EMET vs. KCOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EMET

• 1D: -5.73%
• 1M: -5.77%
• YTD: 11.62%
• 6M: 11.02%
• 1Y: 87.54%
• 3Y*: 18.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KCOP

• 1D: -5.58%
• 1M: -4.75%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMET vs. KCOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF	-7.69%
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF	-4.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EMET and KCOP is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026	0.93

Return for Risk

EMET vs. KCOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMET

EMET Risk / Return Rank: 69
EMET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
EMET Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
EMET Omega Ratio Rank: 65
EMET Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
EMET Martin Ratio Rank: 66

KCOP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMET vs. KCOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMET	KCOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.10	—	—

Drawdowns

EMET vs. KCOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMET drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, which is greater than KCOP's maximum drawdown of -21.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMET and KCOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMET	KCOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.05%	-21.55%	-31.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.40%	-12.61%	-2.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.65%	-8.42%	-16.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMET	KCOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.60%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.24%	44.23%	-5.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.37%	44.23%	-10.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.37%	44.23%	-10.86%

EMET vs. KCOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMET has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than KCOP's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMET vs. KCOP - Dividend Comparison

EMET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than KCOP's 5.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF	1.65%	1.84%	1.89%	2.02%	2.56%
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF	5.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMET and KCOP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, EMET and KCOP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EMET or KCOP?

On fees, EMET is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMET or KCOP?

EMET is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KCOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMET or KCOP?

KCOP has the higher dividend yield at 5.29%, compared with 1.65% for EMET.

What is the main difference between EMET and KCOP?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EMET and 0.99% for KCOP.