EMET vs. COPP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EMET (VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF) and COPP (Sprott Copper Miners ETF) are both Copper funds - EMET tracks the MVIS Global Clean-Tech Metals Index while COPP tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EMET returned 87.54% vs 83.48% for COPP. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMET charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPP.

Performance

EMET vs. COPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMET having a 11.62% return and COPP slightly higher at 11.86%.

EMET

• 1D: -5.73%
• 1M: -5.77%
• YTD: 11.62%
• 6M: 11.02%
• 1Y: 87.54%
• 3Y*: 18.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COPP

• 1D: -6.21%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 11.86%
• 6M: 10.91%
• 1Y: 83.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMET vs. COPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF	11.62%	81.22%	0.89%
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF	11.86%	74.02%	4.25%

Correlation

The correlation between EMET and COPP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2024	0.91

The correlation between EMET and COPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EMET vs. COPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMET

EMET Risk / Return Rank: 69
EMET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
EMET Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
EMET Omega Ratio Rank: 65
EMET Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
EMET Martin Ratio Rank: 66

COPP

COPP Risk / Return Rank: 54
COPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
COPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
COPP Omega Ratio Rank: 49
COPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
COPP Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMET vs. COPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMET	COPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	1.85	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	2.30	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.30	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	2.90	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.10	9.67	+1.43

EMET vs. COPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMET Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the COPP Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMET and COPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMET vs. COPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMET drawdown since its inception was -53.05%, which is greater than COPP's maximum drawdown of -44.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMET and COPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMET	COPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.05%	-44.37%	-8.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.58%	-28.91%	+3.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.40%	-14.79%	-0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.65%	-13.90%	-10.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.91%	8.66%	-0.75%

Volatility

EMET vs. COPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) is 15.63%, while Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) has a volatility of 18.53%. This indicates that EMET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMET	COPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.63%	18.53%	-2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.60%	39.30%	-5.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.24%	45.29%	-7.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.37%	41.61%	-8.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.37%	41.61%	-8.24%

EMET vs. COPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMET has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than COPP's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMET vs. COPP - Dividend Comparison

EMET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than COPP's 2.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF	2.12%	2.37%	2.59%	0.00%	0.00%
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF	1.65%	1.84%	1.89%	2.02%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMET and COPP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, EMET and COPP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EMET or COPP?

COPP has higher volatility (18.53%) compared to EMET (15.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMET dropped -53.05% vs COPP's -44.37%.

Which ETF is better, EMET or COPP?

On 1-year performance, EMET leads with 87.54% vs 83.48% for COPP. On fees, EMET is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, EMET has been the lower-risk option at 15.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMET or COPP?

Over the 1-year period, EMET has performed better with a 87.54% return vs 83.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMET or COPP?

EMET is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMET or COPP?

COPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.65% for EMET.

What is the main difference between EMET and COPP?

EMET tracks MVIS Global Clean-Tech Metals Index, while COPP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EMET and 0.65% for COPP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.