EMES.L vs. FEZ
EMES.L (iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF) and FEZ (SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMES.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMES.L returned 1.35%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for FEZ. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMES.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FEZ.
Performance
EMES.L vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMES.L achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than FEZ's 6.42% return.
EMES.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 10.68%
- 3Y*
- 9.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- —
FEZ
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- 17.52%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
EMES.L vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMES.L iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF | 1.50% | 13.10% | 5.45% | 9.57% | -18.82% | -2.59% | 5.41% | 15.66% | -0.48% |
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 6.42% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -14.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMES.L and FEZ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMES.L vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank
EMES.L
FEZ
EMES.L vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EMES.L) and SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMES.L | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.18 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 1.29 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.84 | 4.40 | +5.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMES.L | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 0.98 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.50 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.30 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
EMES.L vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMES.L drawdown since its inception was -28.84%, smaller than the maximum FEZ drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMES.L and FEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMES.L | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.84% | -64.21% | +35.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.48% | -13.63% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.22% | -15.85% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.84% | -35.05% | +6.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -1.18% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -17.07% | +9.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 3.99% | -2.91% |
Volatility
EMES.L vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EMES.L) is 2.26%, while SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that EMES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMES.L | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 6.45% | -4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.55% | 14.88% | -10.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.47% | 17.93% | -12.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.28% | 20.61% | -12.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.24% | 21.11% | -11.87% |
EMES.L vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMES.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMES.L vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison
EMES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, more than FEZ's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMES.L iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF | 5.78% | 5.78% | 5.45% | 5.41% | 5.03% | 3.48% | 3.49% | 4.60% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEZ SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.54% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMES.L and FEZ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EMES.L.
EMES.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while FEZ is Europe Equities. EMES.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EMES.L and 0.29% for FEZ.
Find the right allocation for EMES.L and FEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer