EMDV vs. TDEC
EMDV (ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF) and TDEC (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December) are both exchange-traded funds - EMDV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index, while TDEC is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EMDV returned 7.88% vs 24.15% for TDEC. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMDV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TDEC.
Performance
EMDV vs. TDEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMDV achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than TDEC's 9.14% return.
EMDV
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 7.88%
- 3Y*
- 2.77%
- 5Y*
- -3.15%
- 10Y*
- 2.64%
TDEC
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 24.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMDV vs. TDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | 1.17% | 11.90% | -1.26% |
TDEC FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December | 9.14% | 21.39% | -0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMDV and TDEC is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2024 | 0.77 |
The correlation between EMDV and TDEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMDV vs. TDEC — Risk / Return Rank
EMDV
TDEC
EMDV vs. TDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMDV | TDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.54 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 2.97 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 13.07 | -9.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMDV | TDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 2.41 | -1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 1.81 | -1.59 |
Drawdowns
EMDV vs. TDEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMDV drawdown since its inception was -39.20%, which is greater than TDEC's maximum drawdown of -10.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDV and TDEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMDV | TDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.20% | -10.30% | -28.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -8.16% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.80% | -0.33% | -14.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -1.04% | -12.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 1.85% | +0.52% |
Volatility
EMDV vs. TDEC - Volatility Comparison
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) at 2.81%. This indicates that EMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMDV | TDEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 2.81% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 9.02% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.21% | 10.09% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 11.75% | +3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 11.75% | +6.51% |
EMDV vs. TDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TDEC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMDV vs. TDEC - Dividend Comparison
EMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, while TDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | 2.41% | 2.46% | 2.79% | 1.88% | 3.68% | 2.12% | 3.12% | 2.38% | 1.27% | 2.09% | 2.87% |
TDEC FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMDV and TDEC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMDV has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to TDEC (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDV dropped -39.20% vs TDEC's -10.30%.
On 1-year performance, TDEC leads with 24.15% vs 7.88% for EMDV. On fees, EMDV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, TDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TDEC has performed better with a 24.15% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMDV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.
EMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.00% for TDEC.
EMDV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TDEC is Defined Outcome. EMDV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index, while TDEC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EMDV and 0.95% for TDEC.
TDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMDV and TDEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer