EMDV vs. FTHF

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

EMDV (ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF) and FTHF (First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMDV tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index while FTHF tracks the Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EMDV returned 7.44% vs 80.70% for FTHF. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EMDV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTHF.

Performance

EMDV vs. FTHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDV achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than FTHF's 40.66% return.

EMDV

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 5.84%
• 6M: 0.85%
• YTD: 3.01%
• 1Y: 7.44%
• 3Y*: 2.57%
• 5Y*: -1.53%
• 10Y*: 1.91%
• ALL TIME*: 4.16%

FTHF

• 1D: 3.61%
• 1M: -1.04%
• 6M: 20.31%
• YTD: 40.66%
• 1Y: 80.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 39.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	$3.61K	$6.26K	$10.27K
FTHF First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF	$292.17K	$483.45K	$537.64K

EMDV vs. FTHF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	3.01%	11.90%	0.06%	6.80%
FTHF First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF	40.66%	65.30%	-8.14%	18.14%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDV and FTHF is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023	0.59

The correlation between EMDV and FTHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMDV vs. FTHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMDV	FTHF
Financial Services	24.0%	25.0%
Technology	22.8%	50.9%
Consumer Defensive	14.4%	3.0%
Utilities	8.8%	1.8%
Healthcare	8.4%	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	0.6%
Industrials	6.7%	5.4%
Communication Services	5.8%	0.8%
Basic Materials	2.5%	7.5%
Energy	-	4.6%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

EMDV vs. FTHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMDV

EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 26
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 24
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 27

FTHF

FTHF Risk / Return Rank: 85
FTHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FTHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FTHF Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FTHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FTHF Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMDV vs. FTHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMDV	FTHF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	2.36	-1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	2.83	-1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.40	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	3.85	-2.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.45	13.20	-10.75

EMDV vs. FTHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the FTHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDV and FTHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMDV vs. FTHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDV drawdown since its inception was -39.20%, which is greater than FTHF's maximum drawdown of -21.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDV and FTHF.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMDV	FTHF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.20%	-21.05%	-18.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.24%	-21.05%	+13.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.25%	-12.00%	-1.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.59%	-4.55%	-9.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	6.13%	-3.09%

Volatility

EMDV vs. FTHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) is 3.12%, while First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) has a volatility of 13.69%. This indicates that EMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMDV	FTHF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	13.69%	-10.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.91%	32.05%	-22.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.69%	34.41%	-22.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.42%	27.94%	-12.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.98%	27.94%	-9.96%

EMDV vs. FTHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHF's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMDV vs. FTHF - Dividend Comparison

EMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than FTHF's 3.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	1.87%	2.46%	2.79%	1.88%	3.68%	2.12%	3.12%	2.38%	1.27%	2.09%	2.87%
FTHF First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF	3.24%	4.40%	3.34%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMDV and FTHF in my portfolio?

EMDV and FTHF have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMDV or FTHF?

FTHF has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to EMDV (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDV dropped -39.20% vs FTHF's -21.05%.

Which ETF is better, EMDV or FTHF?

On 1-year performance, FTHF leads with 80.70% vs 7.44% for EMDV. On fees, EMDV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EMDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMDV or FTHF?

Over the 1-year period, FTHF has performed better with a 80.70% return vs 7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMDV or FTHF?

EMDV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTHF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMDV or FTHF?

FTHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 1.87% for EMDV.

What is the main difference between EMDV and FTHF?

EMDV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index, while FTHF tracks Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EMDV and 0.75% for FTHF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.