PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMDV vs. EWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMDV vs. EWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDV achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than EWX's 13.80% return. Over the past 10 years, EMDV has underperformed EWX with an annualized return of 2.64%, while EWX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.72% annualized return.


EMDV

1D
-1.57%
1M
0.78%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.13%
1Y
7.88%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
-3.15%
10Y*
2.64%

EWX

1D
-1.28%
1M
2.47%
YTD
13.80%
6M
15.79%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
9.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDV vs. EWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMDV
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF
1.17%11.90%0.06%-1.03%-18.19%1.11%-0.09%14.93%-7.52%26.98%
EWX
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF
13.80%15.46%6.81%18.13%-15.00%18.15%14.84%15.59%-18.75%34.12%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDV and EWX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2016

0.76

The correlation between EMDV and EWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMDV vs. EWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMDV
EWX

Financial Services

24.1%
4.7%

Technology

22.5%
16.0%

Consumer Defensive

16.4%
2.4%

Utilities

8.3%
1.2%

Healthcare

8.2%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
5.5%

Communication Services

6.2%
0.9%

Industrials

6.2%
9.8%

Basic Materials

1.9%
6.0%

Energy

-

2.0%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Financial Services

EMDV
24.1%
EWX
4.7%

Technology

EMDV
22.5%
EWX
16.0%

Consumer Defensive

EMDV
16.4%
EWX
2.4%

Utilities

EMDV
8.3%
EWX
1.2%

Healthcare

EMDV
8.2%
EWX
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EMDV
6.2%
EWX
5.5%

Communication Services

EMDV
6.2%
EWX
0.9%

Industrials

EMDV
6.2%
EWX
9.8%

Basic Materials

EMDV
1.9%
EWX
6.0%

Energy

EMDV

-

EWX
2.0%

Real Estate

EMDV

-

EWX
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMDV vs. EWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDV
EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

EWX
EWX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDV vs. EWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMDVEWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.35

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

3.59

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

11.37

-8.04

EMDV vs. EWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the EWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDV and EWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMDVEWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

1.93

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.47

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.57

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.22

0.00

Drawdowns

EMDV vs. EWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDV drawdown since its inception was -39.20%, smaller than the maximum EWX drawdown of -63.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDV and EWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMDVEWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.20%

-63.90%

+24.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-7.98%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.71%

-21.37%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.97%

-24.67%

-10.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.20%

-43.00%

+3.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.80%

-1.49%

-13.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.55%

-13.17%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

2.52%

-0.15%

Volatility

EMDV vs. EWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) is 4.17%, while SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX) has a volatility of 5.28%. This indicates that EMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMDVEWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

5.28%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

12.23%

-3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.21%

14.85%

-3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

15.20%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

17.15%

+1.11%

EMDV vs. EWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EWX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMDV vs. EWX - Dividend Comparison

EMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than EWX's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDV
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF
2.41%2.46%2.79%1.88%3.68%2.12%3.12%2.38%1.27%2.09%2.87%0.00%
EWX
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF
2.55%2.91%2.90%2.32%3.00%2.77%2.24%2.73%3.26%2.30%2.46%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMDV and EWX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWX has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to EMDV (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDV dropped -39.20% vs EWX's -63.90%.

On 10-year performance, EWX leads with 9.72% vs 2.64% for EMDV. On fees, EMDV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EMDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWX has performed better with a 9.72% return vs 2.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMDV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EWX.

EWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.41% for EMDV.

EMDV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index, while EWX tracks S&P Emerging Markets Under USD2 Billion Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EMDV and 0.65% for EWX.

EWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMDV and EWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer